BigBoat said:I'd be interested to know if Lance, Levi, Horner are dragging the whole field much of the way or are they sitting in a lot?
.
BigBoat said:I'd be interested to know if Lance, Levi, Horner are dragging the whole field much of the way or are they sitting in a lot?
I sort of "quit". I have a cat 1 license for the road and I still do the races but as for seriousness not so much... I'm not very old and I have the options to ride... I just dont like the sport much anymore with all the Lance loving and PR marketing. Its gotten really old and boring...
In hockey you do not see individuals owning the lions share, in other sports you do not see the negative things that have happend with cycling. All this "livestrong" and one side domination, and the $12,000 bikes... Its just too much. And most of the people that ride are either assholes or mentally insane. Or they quit after 2 years because they dont like it.
mr. tibbs said:I find that the former describes me well.
BigBoat said:I'd be interested to know if Lance, Levi, Horner are dragging the whole field much of the way or are they sitting in a lot?
I sort of "quit". I have a cat 1 license for the road and I still do the races but as for seriousness not so much... I'm not very old and I have the options to ride... I just dont like the sport much anymore with all the Lance loving and PR marketing. Its gotten really old and boring...
In hockey you do not see individuals owning the lions share, in other sports you do not see the negative things that have happend with cycling. All this "livestrong" and one side domination, and the $12,000 bikes... Its just too much. And most of the people that ride are either assholes or mentally insane. Or they quit after 2 years because they dont like it.
rhubroma said:Sounds familiar...In the early 90's I road pretty much all the Pro 1, 2 events (Tour de Toona, Fitchberg-Longsjo Classic, etc.) on the east coast, then came to Italy to ride for a top amatuer team. Then had my eyes opened to a "different cycling culture." In America, at the time at least, doping seemed like a fringe activity practiced by only a few (at least so I believed). Stuff you read about in the far off world of the Tour, but maybey couldn't (didn't want to) believe it. In Italy things were totally different: the team doctors, rider/dealers, the frank and open conversations, etc.
As I said, I could hold my own on the climbs over 3k. Make the selections. But, in the end, there was always someone able to go faster (sometimes rediculously so) in the end. Now I am under no illusions. Mine was a good motor, not an super one. And I don't subscribe to the belief that, had I taken EPO and growth hormones, I'd have climbed like Pantani (though I was once told so!). The fact remains that at my natural best, I saw that I could compete with real pros and that, many of my 3rd and 4th placings were (and I was also told this) first place among the non-dopers. And while I make no excuses for my results, the suspicion that there were always those racing against you that had put a "Ferrari motor" into their natural "BMW" body played in the end a negative role in how I perceived the entire exsasperated sport and, at a certain point, it became sickening.
Having said that, I never stoped loving cycling. And this last adventure on my old bike (against the $ 12,000 ones), with my own natural motor (against the jacked-up ones) is a personal challange to remind me that I can still compete and, above all, have fun.
I always road on pane e acqua ("bread and water" as the Italians say).
franciep10 said:I guess I had the same problem I finished 7 In the 1997 US Time Trial Championship when I was 27 the following year I was getting some interest from pro teams like 7 up but in 1998 I finished 16 with a better time than the year before on the same course when I was crushed by a guy that I beat the year before, then in 1999 i was doing the time trial when I crashed on a oil slick tearing my patella tendon never racing at that level again