The Hitch said:Yeah cos post 2009 Wiggins really struggles with climbs doesn't he.
He doesnt have the big explosive power for short sharp Flanders type climbs. Long drags suit him much better
The Hitch said:Yeah cos post 2009 Wiggins really struggles with climbs doesn't he.
The Hitch said:Yeah cos post 2009 Wiggins really struggles with climbs doesn't he.
It's just fun to see Wiggo up front on the climbs in Flanders, he seems totally out of place and yet he doesn't. And given his Giro antics last year, I'd have expected him to be too afraid to even finish this race.Lanark said:Ok. I just don't see why. He's just a packfilling domesqique now. It's like discussing where Maarten Wynants finished.
Gloin22 said:didnt know Mount Ventoux was a 400 metres 25% climb..
Thx mate for letting us know
![]()
Lanark said:Ok. I just don't see why. He's just a packfilling domesqique now. It's like discussing where Maarten Wynants finished.
The Hitch said:Yeah cos post 2009 Wiggins really struggles with climbs doesn't he.
The Hitch said:Yeah cos post 2009 Wiggins really struggles with climbs doesn't he.
pastronef said:
sorry wise man, I should've said Bergs, Flandrian cobbled 18% bergs. I beg your pardon.
I don't know if you re-read your posts, but ANY sentence not including something negative about Wiggo, is immediately replied to and corrected.
wow, amazing.
by the way, Wiggo was 32nd, 18 sec behind Sagan, and in front of some good riders more suited for these kind of races like Paolini, Phinney (yes I know Taylor was tired after being in the break) Quinziato, Hushovd, Boom (yes I know Boom injured his elbow) Hayman, Trentin etc.
JRanton said:I see Sky will be riding for EBH at Roubaix:
http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/thomas-frustrated-with-performance-at-tour-of-flanders
That'll end well...![]()
spanky wanderlust said:wow. this is a lot of attn paid to a rider who finished in 32nd place.
am i missing something here?![]()
spanky wanderlust said:wow. this is a lot of attn paid to a rider who finished in 32nd place.
am i missing something here?![]()
roundabout said:32nd place today. Good job.
spanky wanderlust said:wow. this is a lot of attn paid to a rider who finished in 32nd place.
am i missing something here?![]()
spanky wanderlust said:wow. this is a lot of attn paid to a rider who finished in 32nd place.
am i missing something here?![]()
karlboss said:Hilarious. What a perfectly Wiggins ride from Wiggins. Did nothing, showed nothing, ended nowhere. Rode like he has decent form just doesn't give a ****.
hatcher said:It's like people didn't even watch the race.
He was with Thomas the entire way round, sheltering him, getting him to the front at the important times, and doing a great team job. After the big crash he did a lot of riding on the front getting Thomas back to the front group.
People say Wiggins can't climb. Their being negativepastronef said:
sorry wise man, I should've said Bergs, Flandrian cobbled 18% bergs. I beg your pardon.
I don't know if you re-read your posts, but ANY sentence not including something negative about Wiggo, is immediately replied to and corrected.
.
Nuash65 said:Are you mates with G to have this insight?
Elsewhere I've read (Sam Hocking http://www.cyclingnews.com/news/thomas-frustrated-with-performance-at-tour-of-flanders ) "Top ride by Wiggins apparently who did a lot of work to get Thomas back to the Cancellera group after Thomas smashed into the central reservation" but you obviously have confirmation that this wasn't the case ...
Or did you base your post on nothing more than your prior prejudice against him?
