Re: Re:
djpbaltimore said:
The Hitch said:
No. No it isn't.
You see the bit where it says "when asked". That's what determines whether he is being a self righteous ***, or if he's just a doper, who doesn't want to be caught.
No one expects any doper yet alone someone as committed to omerta as contador to when asked about doping say "you got me chief. Guilty".
Of course they are going to deny doping if the are asked about it. That would be the end of their career.
The self righteous part is taking the initiative oneself to go out there and spam the media with a fake anti doping narrative. Contador is not doing that. He's not releasing clearly fabricated stories about super training methods that combat doping, or about Riis ripping out pages from tour guides. He doesn't scapegoat either. Stories about how he knew ricco or Armstrong or vino or diluca were cheating him and he hopes they get life bans.
That's what the self righteous BS is. That's what the hypocrisy is.
I don't see how anybody can defend those comments with a straight face.
I don't see anyone who did. Do you? Perhaps you could show me.
It is Omerta pure and simple and shades of Lance Armstrong with the jerseys and logic. What is Contador on? His bike 6 hours a day!
Yes it is. Contador is omerta as most of us said 5, 6 years ago, and many times since. And btw he has been flaunting his doped wins every gt he's won since his return over 3 years ago.
Definition of Self righteous: Having or characterized by a certainty, especially an unfounded one, that one is totally correct or morally superior. This is exactly what hanging up the 2011 Giro and 2010 Tour to teach a lesson to those at his foundation demonstrates.
Strongly disagree. Don't see how that is "self righteous" from Contador. Like most dopers he subscribes to a law of the jungle mentality when it comes to performance enhancing drugs. He believes he won those races since he was on the top of the podium and did nothing the guys beside him didn't. You may disagree but he is entitled to that opinion.
That's all it is, a difference of opinion. You believe someone caught with clenbuterol should lose the title and be banned for two years. He believes they shouldn't, or at least that whoever wins a race, wins the race.
I've never seen Contador claim to be morally superior on anything. He shies away from the spotlight, limiting himself to the bare minimum of media appearances. When he does talk its all cliche's about racing being hard, wanting to win, liking attacking and general praise for all his opponents even the weak ones, and constant praise for dopers like Lance, Pantain, Riis, Indurain etc.
No one expects a rider to come clean, but Contador is often suggested by people in the clinic to not be as strident in his answers.
And he isn't.
But his answer about doping is as over the top as any current rider has given about the current state of the peloton. Comparing doping to suicide? Hyperbole at its worst.
well the suicide comment is a figure of speech.
But yes his answer is way over the top and obviously a lie.
But what you are trying to say he's as bad as others.
Let's not beat around the bush. Its mostly sky you have in mind and don't like that they get criticised for self righteous hypocrisy when in your eyes Contador does the same.
Contador isn't doing the same though. Even here all he's doing is making a general comment on the state of anti doping and not about himself.
There's no claim to be a great warrior of anti doping.
No ZTP.
No accusations against other riders and teams. No scapegoating of easy targets.
No stories about training.
If you want to look away from Sky then people like Nibali to some extent and JV to a very large extent also behave this way. Or Paula Radcliffe shoving her face into doping discussions calling for longer bans, more tests, Federer doing that a few days ago.
You ever see Contador calling for longer bans on his fellow dopers?
You seen him tweet that testers should visit Tenerife when Froome is there?
You see him holding "EPO cheats, out" sign?
You see him throwing doubt at Sky or Astana or Katusha?
Calling into question transformations?
You see him throw the likes of Ricco to the wolves and say "I knew he was doping when I saw him beat me on Kronplatz"? In fact, Contador still hesitates to call Lance a cheat, even after lance got caught saying stuff like "
if these allegations are true, then its bad".
You see him claim that Basso comes to him to learn how to get clean, the way Froome claimed Basso went up to him and Richie to learn about how to ride clean?
You see him commit to scientific tests and then go back on that. Give bs stories about the anti doping culture in his team or the training?
Contador may very well be self righteous on a lot of things. He's no saint and I don't know him personally. But publicly he has never done any of the above and on the issue of doping keeps his head down and certainly doesn't try to make himself into a hero nor others into villains.