Moose McKnuckles said:
Lance fans circa 2005: "A ton of anecdotal, ambiguous, unquantifiable, simplistic, flawed and myopic evidence against Lance. Which isn't really evidence. Enough for many of course"
Thanks for the trip down memory lane.
There was evidence for Lance, and I said then.
There were some people talking, as simeoni, but more, there was a strange calendar, just flying in July, puting lot of time with everybody with hight W/kg, and the more evidence was when we Knw that Pantani, Ullrich, Basso, were not doped, but using very high doping programs againts him, they are good riders, and they beated him.
Now, nothing of that is with SKy or Froome, there is not evidence Nibali dope or the others big names, the numbers are differents, so, why dont believe?, just to some coincidences that look a little bit amazing?
I understand your point, but you need to investigate more over SKY and the life of his riders IMO
Maybe you are right, but you could not be right, have u think about it?
And a lot of people are always with the same thing about SKY and Froome
