Will Contador Be Juiced Up Again Upon His Return

[deviant]

Froome wont be a factor in the tour at this rate, on today's evidence it is a Contador coronation ride....the Bertie we saw at the TdF last year (good but just off the podium) was probably the true reflection of what a clean Contador can achieve.

 

[Nathan12]

Froome wont be a factor in the tour at this rate, on today's evidence it is a Contador coronation ride....the Bertie we saw at the TdF last year (good but just off the podium) was probably the true reflection of what a clean Contador can achieve.

I think this Contador is on a level with 2013 Froome.

 

[Parrulo]

Froome wont be a factor in the tour at this rate, on today's evidence it is a Contador coronation ride....the Bertie we saw at the TdF last year (good but just off the podium) was probably the true reflection of what a clean Contador can achieve.

A clean Contador finishing 4th on a field of dopers? Hmmm . . . i think not

 

[GJB123]

It's simply not possible to sell clean cycling with Contador/Riis/Tinkoff combination at helm.

It's not possible to sell clean cycling if you hire dope doctors, dope DS's, are as transparent as Bejing on smog alarm and are matching or surpassing climbing times out of the dope era. But hey don't let that stop you.

 

[Nathan12]

indeed!!!!

Poor Chicken. He was ahead of his time.

 

[autologous]

1. Tony Martin (OPQS) 38:33
2. Contador (Tinkoff-Saxo) 38:40

Ah, the gif.
last resource of the illiterate

 

[EnacheV]

Ah, the gif.
last resource of the illiterate

please tell me why Contador is clean. You seem to disagree .

 

[GJB123]

please tell me why Contador is clean. You seem to disagree .

Please tell me why Froome is clean. You seem to disagree.

 

[autologous]

please tell me why Contador is clean. You seem to disagree .

what? where does my post mention Contador?

 

[Nathan12]

please tell me why Contador is clean. You seem to disagree .

I don't think anyone's seriously arguing that. But you can't claim Contador is dirty whilst being so sure that Froome is clean. It defies logic.

 

[GJB123]

I don't think anyone's seriously arguing that. But you can't claim Contador is dirty whilst being so sure that Froome is clean. It defies logic.

Exactemundo, right on the money!

 

[neineinei]

It's simply not possible to sell clean cycling with Contador/Riis/Tinkoff combination at helm.

Yeah, now we are at the core of the "zero tolerance" of Sky, selling cycling.

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

It would be hilarious if he get's beaten by Froome and get's pinged again. This place would implode

AC will never never never be positive again... Cycling can´t afford such a scandal. Impossible.

 

[the sceptic]

please tell me why Contador is clean. You seem to disagree .

Let me clear up a few things for you.

No one thinks Contador is cleans, except maybe skybots trying to save face.

Contador getting close to TM in a hilly ITT, is a lot more belivable than Dawg doing the same in a flat ITT.

And yet, Dawg is the one with a horde of rabid bots defending him.

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

It's not possible to sell clean cycling if you hire dope doctors, dope DS's, are as transparent as Bejing on smog alarm and are matching or surpassing climbing times out of the dope era. But hey don't let that stop you.

That´s why they should have shut down the whole RSH team...

 

[EnacheV]

AC will never never never be positive again... Cycling can´t afford such a scandal. Impossible.

exactly the opposite

cycling can't afford the resurgence of dirty dopers

especially the combination of Contador/Riis/Tinkoff which is horrible

 

[peloton]

Let me clear up a few things for you.

No one thinks Contador is cleans, except maybe skybots trying to save face.

Contador getting close to TM in a hilly ITT, is a lot more belivable than Dawg doing the same in a flat ITT.

And yet, Dawg is the one with a horde of rabid bots defending him.

Nail. Head.

This July might be interesting after all

 

[EnacheV]

Does say a lot about the excitement of some honorable Clinic 12 members at the comeback of doping Contador.

Put's a new perspective on the 10'000 hateful posts in other clinic threads.

Anti doping knights being only butthurt fans of ex winners turn losers by doping controls.

Why not go to assault Contador on twitter, if you are so fervent defenders of clean cycling.

Hypocrisis at its best.

 

[Nathan12]

exactly the opposite

cycling can't afford the resurgence of dirty dopers

especially the combination of Contador/Riis/Tinkoff which is horrible

What makes you think Julich and Sutton had a sudden conversion to clean cycling?

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

exactly the opposite

cycling can't afford the resurgence of dirty dopers

especially the combination of Contador/Riis/Tinkoff which is horrible

Cookson knows it, the sponsors, the functionaries... they can not let that happen again. It would be like Monsanto goes public and tells the truth that their $hit is killing.
UCI might be dumb (or was), but they are no japanese suicide pilots...

 

[analogue17]

Let me clear up a few things for you.

No one thinks Contador is cleans, except maybe skybots trying to save face.

Contador getting close to TM in a hilly ITT, is a lot more belivable than Dawg doing the same in a flat ITT.

And yet, Dawg is the one with a horde of rabid bots defending him.

Alright, let's assume both of them are dopers. Why do despise one of them and support the other one entirely? Is it logical and rational in your opinion?

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

Does say a lot about the excitement of some honorable Clinic 12 members at the comeback of doping Contador.

Put's a new perspective on the 10'000 hateful posts in other clinic threads.

Anti doping knights being only butthurt fans of ex winners turn losers by doping controls.

Why not go to assault Contador on twitter, if you are so fervent defenders of clean cycling.

Hypocrisis at its best.

Nice that you found that out lately... You hit the point.

 

[FoxxyBrown1111]

Alright, let's assume both of them are dopers. Why do despise one of them and support the other one entirely? Is it logical and rational in your opinion?

He is like that. "Redflanders" is another one, but at least he was honest (he told me in an open post that he likes everything about CH, but is sure he is doping; OTOH calls me trolling/nonsensical if I use the same hateful comments on his idol like the "Clinic superstars" do constantly on Froome, his girl, SKy, basically everybody close to british road cycling... if dopers get caught w/other teams they do all twists possible to connect these advents to Sky. It´s grotesque.)

 

[roundabout]

Not anywhere near 2009. I am disappointed. I thought he crushed Martin when I looked at the number of posts this thread had in the last 2 hours.

 

[HSNHSN]

Yep I realise that but here's a rider who was pinged for doping, so is it safe to assume his stellar performances of yonder were somewhat dubious ? He then returned and didn't ride at his previous level. Now he's looking back to that level, so either he's back on the juice or somehow he's suddenly improved naturally to the level that previously required dope to achieve - may be it is that new training regime.

Marginal gains. Obviously.

I have to agree he shouldn't be allowed to ride at this level due to a doping past, but it is as it is. I still see no reason to prefer someone who is probably doping over someone who is probably doping again.