- Apr 19, 2010
- 1,112
- 0
- 0
EnacheV said:I'm dissapointed
I would rather have new doper faces instead of the same old doper in the headlines.
EnacheV said:I'm dissapointed
I would rather have new doper faces instead of the same old doper in the headlines.
Nathan12 said:But if at some point clean performances will pass the doped performances of the past, is there not a fairly decent chance that the 2014 Contador is clean?
Nathan12 said:But if at some point clean performances will pass the doped performances of the past, is there not a fairly decent chance that the 2014 Contador is clean?
bigcog said:I'm not sure how you can argue that. Please elaborate.
bigcog said:I'm not sure how you can argue that. Please elaborate.
GJB123 said:Moehahahaha, go and cry where we don't have to deal with you.![]()
Nathan12 said:But if at some point clean performances will pass the doped performances of the past, is there not a fairly decent chance that the 2014 Contador is clean?
EnacheV said:i'm not crying, im pretty happy already![]()
Contador is doped like a Fukushima fish. He will be caught. 2nd at tour is good enough to win.
webbie146 said:Yes if Sky can make such absurd statements then Tinkoff can too![]()
EnacheV said:i'm not crying, im pretty happy already![]()
Contador is doped like a Fukushima fish. He will be caught. 2nd at tour is good enough to win.
the sceptic said:Contador is doping, but he is also talented.
EnacheV said:how do you know that ?
For me is a doper from 16y old, like Ben Swift right ?
EnacheV said:how do you know that ?
For me is a doper from 16y old, like Ben Swift right ?
EnacheV said:no they cant, when your main rider is a doper, your DS is a doper and your owner is openly endorsing doping one.
Digger said:Brailsford reckons clean will outperform doped ones.
EnacheV said:no they cant, when your main rider is a doper, your DS is a doper and your owner is openly endorsing doping one.
Digger said:Rogers
Sean Yates
Wiggins openly endorsing Lance and ALberto
happychappy said:1. Tony Martin (OPQS) 38:33
2. Contador (Tinkoff-Saxo) 38:40
![]()
bigcog said:Yep I realise that but here's a rider who was pinged for doping, so is it safe to assume his stellar performances of yonder were somewhat dubious ? He then returned and didn't ride at his previous level. Now he's looking back to that level, so either he's back on the juice or somehow he's suddenly improved naturally to the level that previously required dope to achieve - may be it is that new training regime.
EnacheV said:If i would know your post history from Sky threads i might take you seriously.
However , the difference here is between a clean supposed doper versus a doper supposed doped again.
That's why i said i would rather have some new people winning, not the already dirty Contador/Valverde/etc
