Will Contador Be Juiced Up Again Upon His Return

Page 104 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

Will Contador Be Juiced Up Again Upon His Return

  • NO

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
Apr 3, 2009
12,601
8,463
28,180
RobbieCanuck said:
I assume you are referring to the ONLY test AC has ever tested positive for in any cycling race in his career, the one where he had 50 picograms of clen in his sample on July 21, 2010 at the TDF in spite of no clen in the samples of every test leading up to July 21.

Just so we are clear the 50 trillionths of a gram of clen that any normal, sane and rational person in the world will tell you was impossible to have had a performance enhancing effect - that juice? The juice that had no effect on his winning the 2010 TDF!

I would assume he's referring to the blood doping program Alberto was on during his tenure with Mr. Armstrong and the Hog. And assuming similar form is a result of similar doping. Or did he crush everyone else who was doping back then clean?

The clen thing is a joke, obviously. But to imagine that it's the only indication that Contador is doping is extreme head-in-the-sand, brilliant stuff.
 
Mar 9, 2013
1,996
0
0
You're wrong no performance is doubted as much as Froome, magical transformation you will plead is why well sorry if i reply with one was beating dpers all his carear why the other could not keep up. You no aswell as i do their is more hate towards Froome than Contador and one has not failed(cue the LA never failed a test argument). Why is their hardly any talk of Kelderman see the forum is just so hypocritical.
 
Mar 9, 2013
1,996
0
0
Not trying to start an argumen or nit pick but really proves my point as no one has responded it is pure fact what i said.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
TANK91 said:
Not trying to start an argumen or nit pick but really proves my point as no one has responded it is pure fact what i said.

Maybe no one has responded yet because
1 you're a troll
2 it's only been half an hour since you posted it
3 it's so random and out of the blue I'm not sure anyone really understands who/what you're replying to, what you're trying to argue and most importantly, why
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
Gentle(wo)men...and TANK91 ;),
I've been pretty lenient recently on the intentional baiting, but it stops right now

capiche?

cheers
bison
 
Mar 9, 2013
1,996
0
0
sittingbison said:
Gentle(wo)men...and TANK91 ;),
I've been pretty lenient recently on the intentional baiting, but it stops right now

capiche?

cheers
bison

WTF are you on about man i was respnding to red flanders i forgot to quote him. I said it is a fact Froome is more hated and he is the one who atleast can say he has not failed. That is not baiting dude that is having a diff opinion, why isit you always follow me around.
 
Jul 5, 2012
2,878
1
11,485
TANK91 said:
...why isit you always follow me around.

you are the last person I want to follow around, but if you must know the answer to your question is self evident.

A difference of opinion is one thing...and why you are still able to post here. Baiting, trolling and insulting are a different matter, and the line often gets crossed
 
Apr 30, 2011
47,151
29,781
28,180
TANK91 said:
WTF are you on about man i was respnding to red flanders i forgot to quote him. I said it is a fact Froome is more hated and he is the one who atleast can say he has not failed. That is not baiting dude that is having a diff opinion, why isit you always follow me around.

Since that obviously has nothing to do with red's post nor the topic of this thread, it does sound like baiting.
 
Jul 12, 2012
8,975
591
19,080
Just watching 2/3rds of the Tenerife Trio in these opening stages of the Dauphine have me in no doubt. Froome even had the cheek to come out in an interview and say it's funny how they don't get tested up there. They are both taking full *** to the next level.
 
Jul 25, 2012
12,967
1,970
25,680
Contador's got more juice in him than the man from Del Monte. Not sure it'll help against the alien though.
 
Apr 3, 2011
2,301
0
0
King Boonen said:
Contador's got more juice in him than the man from Del Monte. Not sure it'll help against the alien though.

Well, hard to say, but one thing is clear. Sky managed to set such a high level that nobody is afraid anymore (last year they still were).

Situatioin not dissimilar to post-Festinagate years, when in 1999 people were cautious, even Ulle came to TdF rather low-loaded, but what they saw? Uniballer going full *** and more, under the protective curtain of UCI/ASO mafia. So in the coming years everyone went fuller and fuller *** (though nobody had that good doctors and was that exceptional responder).
 

Big Doopie

BANNED
Oct 6, 2009
4,345
3,989
21,180
doperhopper said:
Well, hard to say, but one thing is clear. Sky managed to set such a high level that nobody is afraid anymore.

I just love these Clentadopologists.

Clentadoppucci's lifelong dependence on PEDs to commit fraud is now the fault of SKY's doping program since, what, 2011?

ROTFFLMFAO!!
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Big Doopie said:
I just love these Clentadopologists.

Clentadoppucci's lifelong dependence on PEDs to commit fraud is now the fault of SKY's doping program since, what, 2011?

ROTFFLMFAO!!

God you're annoying. FFS.
 
Apr 8, 2014
408
0
0
Big Doopie said:
I just love these Clentadopologists.

Clentadoppucci's lifelong dependence on PEDs to commit fraud is now the fault of SKY's doping program since, what, 2011?

ROTFFLMFAO!!

Well, yes. It's the old 'arms race' again. Like in 1999, cycling had a chance to be clean. Sky seem to have destroyed that possibility- now everyone's racing to catch up.
 
Aug 13, 2010
3,317
0
0
Nathan12 said:
Well, yes. It's the old 'arms race' again. Like in 1999, cycling had a chance to be clean. Sky seem to have destroyed that possibility- now everyone's racing to catch up.
In 1999 the threat of going to jail was what made teams take a step back. What do you suggest was stopping people from doping up until now?
 
May 26, 2010
28,143
5
0
Don't be late Pedro said:
In 1999 the threat of going to jail was what made teams take a step back. What do you suggest was stopping people from doping up until now?

The only thing stopping people doping after 2006 was, according to JV, is that it was not cool anymore ;)
 
Apr 3, 2011
2,301
0
0
Big Doopie said:
I just love these Clentadopologists.

Clentadoppucci's lifelong dependence on PEDs to commit fraud is now the fault of SKY's doping program since, what, 2011?

ROTFFLMFAO!!

Albuterol has long enough history, that's clear (not a fan nor apologist) - but it's not only him, everyone was just overwhelmed by Skyborgs and it took time to get courage and catch up, hence the parallel with 1999. And the difference between low-juice Clentador of 2013 and his current form is simply amazing.
 
Jun 16, 2010
1,458
0
10,480
red_flanders said:
I would assume he's referring to the blood doping program Alberto was on during his tenure with Mr. Armstrong and the Hog. And assuming similar form is a result of similar doping. Or did he crush everyone else who was doping back then clean?

The clen thing is a joke, obviously. But to imagine that it's the only indication that Contador is doping is extreme head-in-the-sand, brilliant stuff.

Prove he was on a doping program, because you can't. That is the ultimate head in the sand. Baseless, biased and puerile speculation without evidence from a Contador hater.
 
Jun 14, 2010
34,930
60
22,580
Nathan12 said:
Well, yes. It's the old 'arms race' again. Like in 1999, cycling had a chance to be clean. Sky seem to have destroyed that possibility- now everyone's racing to catch up.
I don't think cycling had a chance to go clean in 1999. The testing was still way behind the doping. The doctors still wanted money. Human nature, as always, willing to give a ridiculous amount of benefit of the doubt to anyone who did dope.
Many of cyclists friends and contacts in other sports were doping.

There is no way in my mind that there wouldn't be people who pretty soon started doping again, and all it takes is 1 or 2 to move the goalposts for everyone.
 
Jan 8, 2011
18
0
0
RobbieCanuck said:
I assume you are referring to the ONLY test AC has ever tested positive for in any cycling race in his career, the one where he had 50 picograms of clen in his sample on July 21, 2010 at the TDF in spite of no clen in the samples of every test leading up to July 21.

Just so we are clear the 50 trillionths of a gram of clen that any normal, sane and rational person in the world will tell you was impossible to have had a performance enhancing effect - that juice? The juice that had no effect on his winning the 2010 TDF!

But it indicate that he probably has used it out of competition when he build up his form in order to loose some weight.

The low levels of clen could be a sign of blood doping. The Beef story nobody buys.
 
Mar 9, 2013
572
0
0
Mr. Larsen (DK) said:
But it indicate that he probably has used it out of competition when he build up his form in order to loose some weight.

The low levels of clen could be a sign of blood doping. The Beef story nobody buys.

And just to play devils advocate here. You buy that 50 picograms was a legit positive? C'mon bro? Really. They sent it to a special lab for the test? No? Do we do that for every rider?