- Jul 4, 2011
- 1,899
- 0
- 0
Cobblestones said:The answer to your objections is: yes, and?
What is NATO nowadays? What purpose does it serve? Considering a true and lasting peace in Europe, does NATO in its present form have a positive or negative effect? What is more important for the future in Europe, an unchanged NATO or reduce the mistrust between Russia and the rest of Europe?
When you finish thinking about those questions, there's a second set of questions, where you replace 'NATO' with 'the US': does the US have a positive or negative effect on peace in the greater European region today? Why are the US/Russian relations so bad? What about the argument that normalization of relations will lead to democratization and peace? Does that not apply to Russia? Does it only apply to China? Anyway, who has greater deficiencies in democracy and human rights? Russia or China?
At present, I would argue that the US is still a positive player in Europe, but will that be true when the US/Russia relations don't improve? I'm not so sure about NATO any more. Stationing the missile defense system (against an completely overblown Iranian 'threat') and considering NATO's role in the Middle East, I would have a hard time seeing NATO's positive impact. Why then, would you cling to this organization or use its continued existence in an argument?
To be fair, I was pretty worried about these issues (especially the missile defence system in Czech Republic) when we were in the Bush Putin era. Since, Obama and Medvedev have become presidents the relations between the countries have improved what with the signing to the Nuclear START treaty though it did somewhat flare up in May.
Here's some clarification about the missile defence system
http://rt.com/news/czech-us-defense-system/
http://www.defencetalk.com/us-scraps-missile-defense-plan-for-czech-republic-34950/
About their joining the EU, I don't think that will happen. The furthest they will go is to hope that Russia will join the Shengen group of nations for visa fre travel.
Let's not forget in the late '90s this country was in super deep **** and there is still a very great feeling of betrayal among the population on part of the IMF. Also their govt channel RT is a Euro skeptic.
edit:
I think we all know what the answers for the first set of questions are. They have strained relations in the past especially again during the Bush Putin years. Yes there is political hegemony in Russia as it is pretty much a One Party Democracy, much like all new democracies (India had its first full 5 year govt by a non congress party in 1999 nearly 50 years after the country became republic). Unfortunately, there is the shutting up of political enemies culture (Anna Politkovskaya) but there are critics of the govt and there is much much more freedom of speech than in China.