- Aug 9, 2012
- 2,223
- 0
- 11,480
Yes so he ran to the UK, which is more or less open territory for extradition, both the legal kind and extralegal kind. Good plan!Cobblestones said:In his shoes, I would not go anywhere near Sweden, which has in fact a very cozy agreement with the US concerning extradition (which is precisely why Assange tries to avoid going there without further reassurances).
As for Swedish extradition. Two Egyptians were rendered 10 years ago or something. The Justice minister responsible was killed by a nutter before the case broke. Had she still been alive she and likely the then PM would have been in trouble.
Sweden is one of the countries in Europe which is the most difficult to get people extradited from to the US. The Swedes have extra protection in regards to media, wistleblowing etc.
Last year there was a story about an airforce deserter(with security clearance) who has been in Sweden since the eighties. The US will not get him. A few months ago there was a story about someone wanted(I think a US citizen living and married in Sweden) for spying for Cuba. They are not going to get her either.
And the Swedish government can't give reassurances that he will not be legally extradited, since that would mean the government prejudging a court case. That is a big no no, in Sweden. As for guarantees against rendition: It's against Swedish law. It's already guaranteed.
Don't swallow the Assange PR line. Read the documents available from the UK process, they are available online. And stay away from assange fan sites, their information is skewed if not falsified. Get the original court documents.
So that's who killed Palme? You'd better call the Swedish police and tell them about it. I'm sure that would be a completely new theory.Cobblestones said:The CIA has had an unduly influence on Sweden through the Swedish nationalists ever since the coup and assassination of Olof Palme.
As for the Coup, yes that was a difficult period for Sweden. Wait they had a coup!?
Yes I'm sure Barth Eide would influence any properly filed extradition request, and no doubt has the police ready to do his bidding in order to further his own ambitions.Cobblestones said:Also, the idea to travel to Iceland through Norway is utterly ludicrous. He would have to enter Schengen in Norway at which point the Norwegian police surely would apprehend him (Barth Eide has plans to rise in the UN system).
Oh, wait, he can't! We're not some country with elected prosecutors and politically appointed judges like those banana republics and the... US....
Cobblestones said:Anyway, it seems that the US is doing what Eastern Block countries used to do with their dissidents. They annulled his passport (does that mean they have rescinded his citizenship?) What really is the difference between Uncle Sam and Erich Mielke now? Not that it matters. Ecuador could easily issue travel documents. Maybe Snowden could get a Nansen passport which would be quite the irony. If he stays in transit he won't need a passport neither at Sheremetyevo, nor in Habana I presume (though I have to admit, I haven't been to that airport yet).
I hope he has a speedy and uneventful journey to wherever he's going. It seems just like yesterday that these kinds of drama have played out with Eastern Block dissidents. Remember Sakharov's wife Yelena Bonner seeking medical treatment in the US? Nowadays, it's people like Assange and Snowden, the countries they're having problems with are the US, UK and Sweden, and the safe routes involve countries such as Hong Kong, Russia, Cuba and Ecuador. The world has truly changed.
I wouldn't put Snowden in the same group as Assange. Assange is a man who has made himself bigger than his cause.
Snowden is a guy who did what he thought was right, no matter the consequences.
