Re: Re:
blutto said:
python said:
Brullnux said:
python said:
another very significant development just took place short hours ago - turkey invades syria.
http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-37171995
the official turkish reports refer to an action against isis, but the invasion route is on a syrian kurdish town of jarablus...another report already quoted the kurdish complaints.
several factors complicate sifting thru the development. supposedly, the us airforce is supporting the action. it is absolutely unclear how the us can support an assault on their kurdish allies
also, the russians must be informed of the turkish actions (if not approving them) b/c the turkish airforce is operating in the syrian airspace controlled by the russian surface-to-air missiles.
i truly dont understand what is going on.
From the article you gave the link to it says 'the operation was aimed against both IS and Kurdish fighters'. Which is a pretty disgusting move from Erdogan imo. It makes some sense from his point of view, damage the Kurds in Syria which have always been close to the Turkish Kurds so that they won't be able to help the Turkish Kurds to ask for greater autonomy or just become a separate nation. However, this is a stupid and disgusting move for many other reasons which have much more logic and sense behind them, such as actually helping Daesh, which of course has never hindered Erdogan before in the last so I guess it would be naive to expect it to do so now. It also moves him further and further away from the West, and this I guess shows a complete and clean divergence from the US foreign policy in the region. I think he may regret this in the long run.
here's an objective attempt to add some clarity after a full day or convoluted reports and actions have gone by. my apologies for omitting links to the sources...there are too many to fit the short post and my time frame.
-the turkish attack in northen syria was indeed aimed at the isis controlled kurdish town of jarabulus. according to several sources, the kurdish fighetrs were in the vicinity, but were neither attacked nor offered a fight. also, the forces that now control the border town are the so called free syrian army fully supported by the turks.
-the turkish invasion was FULLY supported by the us. the us vice prez joe biden (now in turkey) loud and clear said just that
...and here is the relatively speculative news narratives:
a) according to those claiming to quote the biden statements, he issued the ultimatum to the syrian kurd (demanded by the turks) - withdraw to behind the Euphrates river or lose the us support. the sources i consider reliable report that the kurds indeed are heeding the us demands and are withdrawing.
b) the russian position appears ambiguous. on the one hand, they confirm being informed, but on the other they *** about the violation of the syrian sovereignty. my hunch is they aren't happy but have to play the complicated game due to the recent rapprochement attempts. i guess they want the kurds to get pissed with the us and the turks to put more conditions on obama (besides the gulen extradition) to promote themselves as an alternative. my hunch is that the us-kurdish games are likely to blow up in the biden face...
....the following may help bring some clarity to the situation....with a big emphasis on may...
...a key bit is the following....
However ‘inconvenient’ it may be for the most gung-ho (usually foreign-based) supporters of Syria to admit, Damascus and Ankara have been engaged in secret talks for months now in the Algerian capital of Algiers, as has been repeatedly confirmed by many multiple media sources ever since this spring. Moreover, Turkey just dispatched one of its deputy intelligence chiefs to Damascus a few days ago to meet with his high-level Syrian counterparts, so this might explain the reason why Russia and Iran aren’t condemning Turkey’s incursion into Syria, nor why the Syrian officials aren’t loudly protesting against it either. More and more, the evidence is pointing to Turkey’s operation being part of a larger move that was coordinated in advance with Syria, Russia, and Iran. Nevertheless, for domestic political reasons within both Syria and Turkey, neither side is expected to admit to having coordinated any of this, and it’s likely that bellicose rhetoric might be belched from Ankara just as much as it’s predictable that Damascus will rightfully speak about the protection of its sovereignty
.
...now here is a wild stab in the dark....Turkey decided a long while ago to leave the NATO orbit and settle in with Russia/Iran, the Syrian negotiations, if they in fact were as reported in the article, seems to confirm that...the US got wind of this late and had to act fast to head off the move of Erdogan to Russia/Iran....and this haste produced the botched coup attempt that we saw ( and ironically strengthened Erdogan's hold on Turkey and as a result he could move the chess pieces around with much greater speed further mucking up Merika's chance to head things off...)....just a thought produced by connecting the few dots that are visible....
...and if this true this is really gonna piss off Israel and their lapdogs, errr, close friends in Washington...and this also means goodbye to the Qatari pipeline dreams....and Europe is now most likely going to have to re-engage with Russia, since Russia now holds the big energy cards again....
https://off-guardian.org/2016/08/25/turkey-crosses-into-syria-unipolar-conspiracy-or-multipolar-coordination/
Cheers
don't know what to say...the analysis you linked to is interesting if not plausible and your' stab in the dark' aint all that impossible.
it is very difficult to know what is really going on with the turkish invasion as much is not reported and some of what has been presented officially is likely an intentional misinformation. my typical approach under the circumstance is to read as wide a sample of the original sources as possible, particularly from the conflicting sides, as they would try to report/leak what an opponent would be reluctant to..sooo, i am fairly sure of the following findings so far:
-the pre-invasion cooperation btwn turkey, russia, syria and iran seems a fact. it was confirmed by the turkish intelligence officer in an interview with spuntik. also, it is an open information: vlad and erdogan telencoed TODAY while their military chiefs are meeting as i type...
-the us involvement in the turkish coup i doubt, but would be quite sure they knew of it and did not fully inform erdogan. it is unclear to me if the invasion is related to the coup or its failure, but i am fairly sure it hastened the erdogan decision to go in NOW as he's riding the understandable wave of public outcry.
-most sources agree that the size of the turkish invasion contingent is rather small - about 20 tanks and a few hundred troops. most of the fighting was allocated to the 'free syrian army' numbering about 5,000. this indicates they are careful NOT to step in too deep YET. if the us will fail to convince the kurds withdrawal to the east of Euphrates river, i see the expansion of the invasion big time. my hunch is that the russians, iranians, assad and the us told erdogan he'll be supported ONLY unless he goes full *** invasion..
-this leads to the kurds...will they pull back thus preventing a bigger war with the turks in syria ? the reports so far are contradictory. yesterday, the ypg spokesman said they will heed the us ultimatum, but today he reversed himself according to 2 arab sources. this one is the biggest and most crucial unknown. if i was their commander, i'd act rationally and withdraw even if temporarily b/c they stand to lose much more if intransigent.
not only they aren't a military match to a nato member (no heavy weapons and own airforce), but they would get no supplies to last. of course, then the us could forget of fighting isis with kurdish lives. so, the grand design of the 'co-conspirators' (turkey, iran, assad, russia, the us) is (in theory) to displace isis from the 60 km border zone, fill it with the 'moderate' rebels and if the kurds 'behave' to perhaps invite them to a geneva all-syrian talks. this is where turkey will resist by any means and everything can blow up again.
-the russian game appears to play along as long as they extract from turkey and the us some sort of future for the assad govt. i have no idea what vlad contingency plans are if he cant.