- May 13, 2009
- 3,093
- 3
- 0
rhubroma said:The bold is the essence of what afflicts democracy today, in Italy and Europe, as much as in America. Unfortunately we seem to have arrived at a point of no return in this regard, which means the total prepotency and dominion of capital over human beings. Before that democracy has unfortunately offered no citizens' shield nor sanctuary, while has had to capitulate even any semblance of popular sovereignty to those strong powers that truly govern the world.
In the meantime Italy is without a government. Grillo is perhaps more open to a technocrat solution, than he certainly is to one in which his movement gives support to any of the parties. One of the platforms that he stood upon during his electoral campaign was that for decades the Italian parliament has been high jacked by the political parties (and in this he's correct), which has been reinforced by an electoral law that its own crafstman (Roberto Calderoli of the separatist, Northern League party, during Berlusconi's last government) cynically defined as a porcellum (a "filthy pig"). Unfortunately what Grillo obviously misses is that, for better or worse, in democracy you have political parties, which must confront themselves in order to arrive at compromises; otherwise it's called a dictatorship. What unnerves me about Grillo is, therefore, that per certain of his comportments he reminds me of Mussolini in 23. Italy beware.
The reason he has gained popularity though is because many Italians are fed up with the political parties and the career politicians, as well as the unconscionable costs imposed upon the citizenry to finance the so called cast, seeing them and it, in some individual cases quite incorrectly in others not; as pertaining to the same, inseparable and uniform fetid and corrupt porridge, which can no longer be stomached let alone digested in this moment when many struggle just to make ends meet.
In fact in response to criticism levied upon Grillo and his movement that its intransigence before the other voted in parties (which is justified under the facile alibi of merely maintaining an electoral promise not to collaborate with any party - in short the cast must go), demonstrates an irresponsibility that is anti-democratic and places the state hostage to the whims of a megalomaniac and those who elude themselves that he and M5S are the Savior of Italy. To this Vito Cimini, recently nominated M5S senator at a movement assembly in Rome, has stated: "The irresponsible ones are you among the parties who have led us to this terrible spot; the irresponsible ones are you who were incapable of introducing an anti-conflict of interests law; the irresponsible are you who couldn't effect a pensions reform that didn't leave some without one, while being capable of placing a tax on people's primary homes even if they currently find themselves unemployed, while being capable of authorizing garbage dumps and shopping malls without limit, responsible for having covered up mass poisoning by industries like Ilva, incapable of realizing a serious anti-corruption law, incapable of saying no to the colonialization of US military bases, incapable of reducing the costs of politics in a moment in which a third of Italians struggle to arrive at the end of the month on their appallingly low salaries...and we're the ones who should be responsible? If you even have a minimum sense of responsibility, you should simply pack your bags...and disappear!"
Such reasoning is difficult to reject and ignore. Pity that the work that needs to be done cannot be otherwise except through the constitutional parameters, which necessarily involves a functioning government that doesn't work on mandates sent down from above, but through all the democratic praxis that such an institution healthily requires. If M5S and its charismatic leader doesn't want to be transformed into something merely odious (as well as dangerous), then this is a lesson it must learn immediately.
I think you're entirely right and therein lies the the tragic of Grillo and the M5S. The biggest problem for democracy, which has been so perfectly exemplified by what has been called the 'Euro crisis' is that the 'Western, democratic' governments are in realty beholden to some special interest groups such as the banks, and not to the people who elect them. The problem (and the solution btw.) are as old as democracy itself. So for the solution, we should indeed look to the classical Athenian democracy, which had instituted a sort of demarchy, meaning that government positions were distributed by lottery, and/or for very short timespans (down to a single day). The idea is that in such a system, it is much harder for special interest and lobbying groups to influence government decisions. It seems to me that the Italian voter has understood that concept (unsurprisingly maybe, since for instance the Venetian city state had similar rules). However, within the current system, only a corrupted version of demarchy is possible - the rule by jester who makes decisions randomly, making superfluous and a joke of the whole political class. This seems to be the essence of Grillo. What you rightly point out is that Grillo does not seem to realize that decisions will have to be made, nevertheless. A simple blocking of government functions will not serve anybody.
