- Jul 5, 2009
- 2,440
- 4
- 0
Re: Re:
You've got to be more careful with how you digest the "news". A lot of it is propaganda these days and gets repeated so often that it takes place of evidence and facts. Entering the mainstream consciousness it gets accepted as fact, especially because it fits the overall narrative. In this case Russia = bad.
Did Russia bomb that UN convoy?
"The air forces of Russia and Syria did not conduct any strikes against the UN aid convoy in the southwestern outskirts of Aleppo..."
"...the White Helmets that operates in rebel-held areas, posted images of several vehicles on fire"
"...the video recordings of the so-called activists from the scene and found no signs that any munitions hit the convoy..."
"Everything shown on the video is the direct consequence of the cargo catching fire, and this began in a strange way simultaneously with militants carrying out a massive offensive in Aleppo"
"The Americans are firmly blaming the Russians..."
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/09/suspends-syria-aid-convoy-bombed-160920080213025.html
So who are you going to believe? The White Helmets and their shonky video, or the Russians? I know. You've been told repeatedly how bad the Russians are, so you'll probably stick with the White Helmets. http://www.globalresearch.ca/syrias-white-helmets-extensive-and-elaborate-deceptions-of-modern-war-propaganda/5558368
John Swanson
djpbaltimore said:2) If Russia was so concerned with the food shortage, maybe they shouldn't have bombed the UN humanitarian convoy. Hard to argue fog of war with that one, but I am sure that someone will dutifully try to do so.
You've got to be more careful with how you digest the "news". A lot of it is propaganda these days and gets repeated so often that it takes place of evidence and facts. Entering the mainstream consciousness it gets accepted as fact, especially because it fits the overall narrative. In this case Russia = bad.
Did Russia bomb that UN convoy?
"The air forces of Russia and Syria did not conduct any strikes against the UN aid convoy in the southwestern outskirts of Aleppo..."
"...the White Helmets that operates in rebel-held areas, posted images of several vehicles on fire"
"...the video recordings of the so-called activists from the scene and found no signs that any munitions hit the convoy..."
"Everything shown on the video is the direct consequence of the cargo catching fire, and this began in a strange way simultaneously with militants carrying out a massive offensive in Aleppo"
"The Americans are firmly blaming the Russians..."
http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/09/suspends-syria-aid-convoy-bombed-160920080213025.html
So who are you going to believe? The White Helmets and their shonky video, or the Russians? I know. You've been told repeatedly how bad the Russians are, so you'll probably stick with the White Helmets. http://www.globalresearch.ca/syrias-white-helmets-extensive-and-elaborate-deceptions-of-modern-war-propaganda/5558368
John Swanson
