python said:
^you brought an analogy to doping and doping agents...
as i said, this is a very dirty and dark business. it is imo naive to take the info fed to the public w/o any back up evidence.
but to believe into some version is certainly anyone's right. one only needs to be intellectually honest that it ist their opinion not yet based on evidence.
without engaging into an argument, which cant be had yet w/o the independent evidence, i believe it could be a false flag op. or as probable as anything else.
The analogy to doping was only to make the point that these substances can be designed with the aim of avoiding the letter of a weapons agreement. That is quite well established. Almost all of my post was concerned with indisputable facts about nerve agents in general . The only thing I said which is not either factual or which I presented as speculation is that Novichok was the agent used. Yes, it’s possible that it really wasn’t, that the British government is lying about this. Run with that if you want, but rather than focus on why--do the British really want to pick a fight with Putin right now?--i would focus on what actually happened. As I said, the delayed action is a little surprising, and even more so is the delay in warning the public about the danger. Those are facts (unless you're questioning whether it was even a nerve agent, in which case why would the government scare the locals unnecessarily, possibly opening itself up to lawsuits?) that I think stand out more to a scientist than speculation, almost always unprovable, about false flags or whatever.
In fact, the more I think about this, the more the false flag theory doesn’t make sense. If I understand the thinking behind this, government agents poisoned the Skripals, right? Either they used a nerve agent—didn’t have to be Novichok, because they could control the information about it that was released—or something else. If it was something else, there was no need to fabricate a story about contamination in the restaurant, and alarm the public, and as I said, raise the possibility of lawsuits.
OTOH, if it was a nerve agent (which having been factually or falsely identified as Novichok would make the Russian connection more plausible), and there really was contamination, why did they wait a week to inform the public? If this was all planned by the government, they surely would have realized the possibility of contamination at places other than where the Skripals were found. Maybe it wasn’t planned that way, maybe the Skripals were supposed to be affected immediately, but in any case, certainly when the Skripals were found some place distant from where the poisoning took place, the government should have notified the public sooner. Maybe not immediately—they didn’t want it to appear as if they knew it was a nerve agent before they could have had time to examine the Skripals—but certainly sooner than a week. In fact, even before they could have confirmed it was a nerve agent, the government could have reasonably decided to quarantine any places where the Skripals had been seen earlier. A suspicion of a nerve agent would not be suspicious, if I may put it that way.
What’s wrong with this reasoning? Have at it.