ChrisE said:
You still haven't addressed how the underclass, which has always fueled revolution, can get cohesive. The splintered underclass is the root of the problem.
Because that wasn't my point, nor, even if it were, do I have an answer. And also because you never asked me.
Your last comment, however, is spot on in my book.
The problem to me seems to be one of education and lack of stimuli, since every cohesive mass movement has always been led by an intelligentsia: it was this way for the American revolution, the French revolution, the Italian
Risorgimento, as well as with Marx and all the socialist ones of the late XIX century, which culminated with the Bolsheviks and Maoists in the next century. Even fascism, in its various forms, was a form of revolutionary movement, although not with an intelligentsia behind it, but ultimately sheer aggression and prepotency.
Now some of the revolutions begot more liberty if not real enlightenment (one thinks of, for example, the annihilation of native American culture due to the continental expansionism of the US democracy or the persistence of slavery), while others inspired reigns of terror as in Jacobin France (before democracy, after much difficulty - and Napoleon - was finally established), or else wound up in totalitarian regimes as in Russia and China which ended up being kinds of fascist marxism.
Now I will exclude a pure socialist revolution in America, though I will not entirely rule out even the possibility that US democracy under certain conditions could devolve into a new, if only more insidious, type of fascism, as the neocon ideology has recently demonstrated. Especially if certain religious fundamentalists take power, though for now, at least, I'm unable to say
just how likely a scenario this is.
Ideally I'd like to see a revolution based upon more principled and enlightened democratic and social values of the kind Western Europe established at least in part following the Second World War, though times have changed dramatically since the period and hence even this might not be really possible. The thought of a fascist one thus may in the end be the more likely scenario.
But for the revolution I'd like to see happen to take place, the American public needs to be educated and acculturated in ways that the present system simply will not permit.
In this I'm reminded of that George Carlin piece Gregod, I believe, put up here recently. At times there is (so very much) truth in comedy. In the absence of better education and awareness, such a revolution is rather unlikely; which if this may not necessarily lead to fascism, may make any civil transformation not that probable. Especially when the vote means so little today, as you yourself have been made so convinced; which basically means there isn't likely to be one cohesive movement but many competing possibilities struggling to emerge.
We could, therefore, under current globalization, be issuing forth an age of chaos that will take much time to create a new stability through transition.