What be an absolutely epic race that would be! As far as I can understand (which is 0,00000005% when it comes to Italian), its the proposed route and UCI needs to accept it?
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Valv.Piti said:
Valv.Piti said:What be an absolutely epic race that would be! As far as I can understand (which is 0,00000005% when it comes to Italian), its the proposed route and UCI needs to accept it?
Gigs_98 said:May I feel special because the steep climb is the one I proposed in my first post of this thread .
On one hand you might be right that the climb will scare riders. On the other hand I don't know if riders won't be all over the road anyway after 269 km full of climbing.Brullnux said:Final climb is too long and too steep. 3km at 11% would scare riders, could turn into a shitty murito race where nothing happens for 250km except for a war of attrition and a group of 20 take on the climb. Needs to be shorter. Maximum one and half km at that percentage. 3km has to be at 9% maximum. It can have 400m at more than 15% but the rest needs to be fairly shallow imo. If the ending is too hard then it just turns into an Ardennes race.
Yes, apparently it's the proposed route.
Well, on the other hand, it is so hard that only the very best can wait for it. Everyone else needs to start it before the favorites, a bit like in the OGRR.Brullnux said:Final climb is too long and too steep. 3km at 11% would scare riders, could turn into a shitty murito race where nothing happens for 250km except for a war of attrition and a group of 20 take on the climb. Needs to be shorter. Maximum one and half km at that percentage. 3km has to be at 9% maximum. It can have 400m at more than 15% but the rest needs to be fairly shallow imo. If the ending is too hard then it just turns into an Ardennes race.
Yes, apparently it's the proposed route.
Brullnux said:Final climb is too long and too steep. 3km at 11% would scare riders, could turn into a shitty murito race where nothing happens for 250km except for a war of attrition and a group of 20 take on the climb. Needs to be shorter. Maximum one and half km at that percentage. 3km has to be at 9% maximum. It can have 400m at more than 15% but the rest needs to be fairly shallow imo. If the ending is too hard then it just turns into an Ardennes race.
Yes, apparently it's the proposed route.
Netserk said:Well, on the other hand, it is so hard that only the very best can wait for it. Everyone else needs to start it before the favorites, a bit like in the OGRR.Brullnux said:Final climb is too long and too steep. 3km at 11% would scare riders, could turn into a shitty murito race where nothing happens for 250km except for a war of attrition and a group of 20 take on the climb. Needs to be shorter. Maximum one and half km at that percentage. 3km has to be at 9% maximum. It can have 400m at more than 15% but the rest needs to be fairly shallow imo. If the ending is too hard then it just turns into an Ardennes race.
Yes, apparently it's the proposed route.
Then again which country attacked early because they thought their leader will lose on the last climb against other climbers?Brullnux said:Netserk said:Well, on the other hand, it is so hard that only the very best can wait for it. Everyone else needs to start it before the favorites, a bit like in the OGRR.Brullnux said:Final climb is too long and too steep. 3km at 11% would scare riders, could turn into a shitty murito race where nothing happens for 250km except for a war of attrition and a group of 20 take on the climb. Needs to be shorter. Maximum one and half km at that percentage. 3km has to be at 9% maximum. It can have 400m at more than 15% but the rest needs to be fairly shallow imo. If the ending is too hard then it just turns into an Ardennes race.
Yes, apparently it's the proposed route.
True, but 9 man teams. I struggle to believe Italy and Spain will not chase down a lot before the last 30km loop. I am not sure if GvA will be allowed out again.
Of course, it is so hard that riders will be strewn across the road. But I don't necessarily want a war of attrition, I want tactics to play a big part as well. All I really want is a shorter second climb and that would make it the most fun route in many many years.
Tbh, I agree that the route is still anything but perfect. But nevertheless I'm really looking forward to this.Brullnux said:The attack wasn't planned, it was in the spur of the moment. It was also with only one climb to go. I wouldn't be surprised if people attacked with 25 to go, but with this race I doubt any serious moves will go before the last loop. It isn't bad but it could be much better with the options.
With Colombia's depth? (France, Spain, Italia, Netherlands and Great Britain have 3 or more very capable climbers too at the moment)but with this race I doubt any serious moves will go before the last loop.
TromleTromle said:Let's bump this one a bit
Just incoming: https://twitter.com/LasterketaBurua/status/818414526542573568
Netserk said:Briançon '00 (TdF) was 7h56' <-- Does anyone know why it was so slow?
portugal11 said:This race will be the longest in modern cycling. Almost 8 hours of racing should be epic but i fear that GB and Australia will kill this race
The 2015 Giro stage to Fiuggi was 7h22'. 264km, headwind, on hilly terrain. Can't have been a nice recovery ride for BertieNetserk said:Val di Fassa '11 was 7h27'
Firenze '14 was 7h25'
Last WC over 7h before that was '95 @ 7h09'
Briançon '00 (TdF) was 7h56' <-- Does anyone know why it was so slow?
Petrano '09 was 7h11'
MSR '08: 7h14'
MSR '05: 7h11'
MSR '04: 7h11'
MSR '01: 7h23'
MSR '00: 7h11'
I just poked around a bit, but it doesn't seem like it happens very often that a race is over 7h. I'm sure there's some obvious GT stages that I haven't checked that are there as well (in CQ's time frame).
BTW I think it's a bit stupid that none of the flatter worlds are anywhere near MSR in length...
Red Rick said:The 2015 Giro stage to Fiuggi was 7h22'. 264km, headwind, on hilly terrain. Can't have been a nice recovery ride for BertieNetserk said:Val di Fassa '11 was 7h27'
Firenze '14 was 7h25'
Last WC over 7h before that was '95 @ 7h09'
Briançon '00 (TdF) was 7h56' <-- Does anyone know why it was so slow?
Petrano '09 was 7h11'
MSR '08: 7h14'
MSR '05: 7h11'
MSR '04: 7h11'
MSR '01: 7h23'
MSR '00: 7h11'
I just poked around a bit, but it doesn't seem like it happens very often that a race is over 7h. I'm sure there's some obvious GT stages that I haven't checked that are there as well (in CQ's time frame).
BTW I think it's a bit stupid that none of the flatter worlds are anywhere near MSR in length...