Libertine Seguros said:Xavi Tondó? Phil Deignan was top 10 last year.
They will probably also bring Theo Bos.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Libertine Seguros said:Xavi Tondó? Phil Deignan was top 10 last year.
Libertine Seguros said:Xavi Tondó? Phil Deignan was top 10 last year.
Spartacus and the Schlecks peaked for the Classics last year, rode the Tour, and started the Vuelta. Spartacus wore the maillot oro for seven days and won two stages, you might have recalled.
They're part of the 16-team agreement. They had to be invited. Plus, Pereiro.
Look, GC challengers aren't the ONLY thing that makes a Grand Tour team. Garmin don't offer anything for GC but won three stages last year, and with the likes of Iglinskiy on hand, and de la Fuente (who wore the mountains jersey for a couple of days last year), Astana have some options for other ways of keeping the race interesting.
Also, because of long flat stages with searing heat, lots of breakaways go the distance in the Vuelta with people who are out of the race. Therefore bringing in teams and riders willing to be part of that becomes more important than it would be at the Tour.
offbyone said:But again the only team talking a big game about the vuelta is GCE. I just don't like this theme where radioshack is being marked as the only team who doesn't make the vuelta one of their big goals and talking points all season. It is pretty common as far as I can see and radioshack would have a much better team than many are going to send.
Barrus said:The problem for many of the posters is more that RS downplayed the vuelta a lot, stating that the only important races were the Tour de France and the Tour of Cali, many now see this as a form of karma
Publicus said:Not just the Vuelta. Virtually every other race on the calendar IMO.
offbyone said:Sky built a team around one guy with TdF as the ultimate target and they based all this around one race result. They have made it real clear that they are targeting the tour and no other race as their top priority. I just can't see how their vuelta team is going to be have a strong roster when all their big riders have targeted a different part of the season.
Just like in his book...TeamSkyFans said:JB is upset again
@johanbruyneel: Just got word that TRS got snubbed for a bike race in Spain. Stay tuned for my comments. Gonna be interesting and spicy!
hrotha said:Not sure if this is in the Vuelta's best interest, considering they need all the GC contenders they can get and RS might have contributed one or two. If they actually think RS will not have a competitive roster, it's pretty stupid. If this is about Bruyneel and co. dismissing other races including the Vuelta, it's probably even more stupid.
If they have reason to believe RS might not even be able to start, or that they would just bring a big scandal with them, then it's probably a wise decision.
Then it's time for Johan to start running in circles screaming like a schoolgirl.Publicus said:What if it's a combination of all three?????
hrotha said:Then it's time for Johan to start running in circles screaming like a schoolgirl.
MADRAZO said:A rule of teams max riding 2 GTs every year giving room for more teams and also guaranteeing some quality in the teamselections would be great..
Beech Mtn said:Don't be surprised if Contador rides the Vuelta. He has been awfully coy about his post-TdF plans for this year. There have been mentions of someday doing the Tour-Vuelta double or the Giro-Tour double. He apparently wants to try both of the "doubles" some time in his career. I have no idea whether this year is the time, but wouldn't him count out just yet.
.
ttrider said:Would love to see Contador do the Vuelta
MADRAZO said:Hopefully the GT selections next year will be more just, so more teams will get to ride 1 GT and less teams will do all 3 GTs, something only few teams are capable of doing well.
The problem is, of course, lots of points are available in those big races, and so getting into those big races will mean you have more points available, making it easier to get into those big races. Also, the UCI's system for paying points is acknowledged as ridiculous.euanli said:As far as I'm away they will be more just to an extent and will be based on points gathered from earlier races.
Our 2010 Team goals were the Tour de France and the Tour of Spain.
So, it's your right to be invited to the Vuelta? Better read that 2008 agreement a little more closely, Johan. You're not on it.I will fight for our rights and for other things that rightfully belong to us but we never get. There is an abuse of power.
Try discussing that with the head of Vacansoleil. Or Saur-Sojasun. Or Skil-Shimano. Teams that didn't get to go to ANY Grand Tours.Some organizers take away the hunger of potential sponsors to invest in our sport. It is unjust that a new sponsor, coming into cycling with a lot of enthusiasm, is not rewarded for their financial input. For me it is hard to explain to my sponsor that 21 other teams are apparently better than us.
Libertine Seguros said:Pull the other one, Johan.
So, it's your right to be invited to the Vuelta? Better read that 2008 agreement a little more closely, Johan. You're not on it.
Try discussing that with the head of Vacansoleil. Or Saur-Sojasun. Or Skil-Shimano. Teams that didn't get to go to ANY Grand Tours.