Waterloo Sunrise said:
The ASO have moved everyone they initially put at 19 seconds back to 6 seconds, to avoid the situation where people sat down following a crash are given a better time than people who faught their way up the final climb.
It's ultra vires, and being done out of common sense, which I agree with. I just don't understand why those riders are entitled to common sense, but spanish riders get no such help.
Where did the "Spanish riders" thing come from? If you think that Contador is being unfairly persecuted, while that would be whining fanboy gibberish at one level, it would at least make sense as a conspiracy theory. But an ASO/UCI/French plot to do down Spaniards in general? Come off it. Nobody is out to get Samuel Sanchez.
The 3 km rule is inherently arbitrary. It is obviously unreasonable that a rider who crashes 3.0001 Km away from the line should lose time, while a rider who crashes 2.9999 away from the line does not. But the rule is there for a good reason and everyone goes into a race in the full knowledge that it is there.
In this case, as far as all of the people who matter are concerned, the rule has operated exactly as it is supposed to do. Those who were held up by incidents before the 3 km line have to live with it. Those who were held up by incidents after the 3 km line got the same time as the largest remnant of the group they were with when the crash happened. That's what's supposed to happen. That's what did happen. There's no conspiracy.
You are right that the 3 km rule can create an anomaly when some riders avoid the crash and still manage to lose time on the biggest remaining group. In this case though, nobody really gives a donkey's ball hair about the GC time of the likes of EBH anyway.