2011 Tour de France Stage 13: Pau - Lourdes 156km

Page 21 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Checking in... so the GC guys didn't make up time on Hushovd on an NC climb? Seriously? No one with a chance is willing to have a dig. Yawwwwwwwwwn. Come back, Vino. sigh... thanks for the snoozer, guys.
 
This cautious style of cycling is reminding me of what's happened to more than one pro sport in the US in recent decades. For example, American football seems to have fewer and fewer attempts for big plays. They're risky. Teams would rather grind their way down the field, running and making short, safe passes. It's proved to be a winning formula, but it's not as exciting for spectators.

Scores have dropped in NBA basketball games. There's more focus on stifling defenses and again, it's proven to win games, but for most fans it's not as exciting as, say, the 1980s LA Lakers team was. In 1984 the average team scored 110.8 points per game. In 2004 they scored 93.4 points per game.

Reduce risk. Grind out wins like a poker player who slowly plays the odds, gradually shaving chips off his opponents and coming out ahead in the long run. It often works, but it's really freaking boring.
 
Mar 10, 2009
7,268
1
0
rhubroma said:
This is one of those useless stages.

The bigs don't move because tomorrow beckons.

This would have been an ideal 1st week stage, especially if the descent was the finish.
 
Jul 2, 2011
121
0
0
patrick767 said:
This cautious style of cycling is reminding me of what's happened to more than one pro sport in the US in recent decades. For example, American football seems to have fewer and fewer attempts for big plays. They're risky. Teams would rather grind their way down the field, running and making short, safe passes. It's proved to be a winning formula, but it's not as exciting for spectators.

Scores have dropped in NBA basketball games. There's more focus on stifling defenses and again, it's proven to win games, but for most fans it's not as exciting as, say, the 1980s LA Lakers team was. In 1984 the average team scored 110.8 points per game. In 2004 they scored 93.4 points per game.

Reduce risk. Grind out wins like a poker player who slowly plays the odds, gradually shaving chips off his opponents and coming out ahead in the long run. It often works, but it's really freaking boring.

The reason I'm a Vino fan.
 
May 14, 2010
5,303
4
0
patrick767 said:
This cautious style of cycling is reminding me of what's happened to more than one pro sport in the US in recent decades. For example, American football seems to have fewer and fewer attempts for big plays. They're risky. Teams would rather grind their way down the field, running and making short, safe passes. It's proved to be a winning formula, but it's not as exciting for spectators.

Scores have dropped in NBA basketball games. There's more focus on stifling defenses and again, it's proven to win games, but for most fans it's not as exciting as, say, the 1980s LA Lakers team was. In 1984 the average team scored 110.8 points per game. In 2004 they scored 93.4 points per game.

Reduce risk. Grind out wins like a poker player who slowly plays the odds, gradually shaving chips off his opponents and coming out ahead in the long run. It often works, but it's really freaking boring.

Honestly, there was nothing more boring, cautious and predictable than the Armstrong years at the Tour.