It doesn't get more self aggrandizing than a poster calling a pro cyclist a p***y.Cobblestones said:No. Self-depreciation is endearing. Self aggrandizing is not.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
It doesn't get more self aggrandizing than a poster calling a pro cyclist a p***y.Cobblestones said:No. Self-depreciation is endearing. Self aggrandizing is not.
VeloCity said:And athletes, like all human beings, say dumb things sometimes. But instead of saying "ok, that was a dumb thing to say", it's pink tutu's and being called a p**sy, among other derogatory names, by people who don't have a fraction of his talent or have to go through what he goes through on a daily basis.
Calling someone a p**sy is not a joke, it's intended to be demeaning and derogatory.
I'm not a fan of Andy's.
You don't think it's a bit ridiculous for posters on an internet forum who couldn't for a second do what Andy does on a daily basis to be calling him a p***y?
VeloCity said:And athletes, like all human beings, say dumb things sometimes. But instead of saying "ok, that was a dumb thing to say", it's pink tutu's and being called a p**sy, among other derogatory names, by people who don't have a fraction of his talent or have to go through what he goes through on a daily basis.
Calling someone a p**sy is not a joke, it's intended to be demeaning and derogatory.
I'm not a fan of Andy's.
You don't think it's a bit ridiculous for posters on an internet forum who couldn't for a second do what Andy does on a daily basis to be calling him a p***y?
King Of The Wolds said:How many of us have been asked to do something in our job, not fancied it much and moaned like hell to anyone who'll listen?
No_Balls said:This. As much as time were gained on the descent, the fact is that Andy was dropped by Contador going uphill. Bodes for a uncertain future for the Schlecks.
Angliru said:I'll concede the profane remarks are over the top.
Dekker_Tifosi said:And for that money, he performs twice a year.
While we have to work and perform every day if we don't want to get fired...
VeloCity said:And athletes, like all human beings, say dumb things sometimes. But instead of saying "ok, that was a dumb thing to say", it's pink tutu's and being called a p**sy, among other derogatory names, by people who don't have a fraction of his talent or have to go through what he goes through on a daily basis.
Calling someone a p**sy is not a joke, it's intended to be demeaning and derogatory.
I'm not a fan of Andy's.
You don't think it's a bit ridiculous for posters on an internet forum who couldn't for a second do what Andy does on a daily basis to be calling him a p***y?
El Pistolero said:You mean dominating Contador. As long as it went uphill.
VeloCity said:The personal denigration of the Schleck's is getting a bit out of hand. Saying that Andy needs girl panties or pink tutu's while sitting in front of your computer watching him do something you are totally incapable of doing? Really? He's a thousand times the athlete and cyclist you or I or any of us will ever be. Who cares if he whines once in a while? He's still a kid, he's under enormous pressure, he's frustrated, he had a bad day, of course he might say something dumb. Contador has, too. So has Evans. So has every other pro cyclist out there.
All of these guys deserve respect, from Voeckler on down to Bakkazakova - criticize their tactics, their rides, etc, sure, but is there really any need for the personal disparagement?
Angliru said:Everything in your post was on point until you reached the end. This is what is always brought up in Evans' defense as if he's the only rider that has had obstacles to overcome. Dude is in the twilight of his career, has there been nothing but obstacles in his way throughout his long career, stopping him from dominating the sport? Why can't it just be that he's had a great career and leave it at that without the excuses about what could've been if not for......?
Spine Concept said:Evans also changed as a rider, I hear it everywhere, ''Evans is a different rider post WC''. I have seen that change as well. Thus, I do not think it is only his luck that has taken a turn for the better. I am not underestimating the crash, I never did. I was just pointing out that he hasn't been up to his normal standards all year up to this point - and with good reason. He's just dealing with the psychological ramifications of the sad occurrence we know all to well and maybe just needed some more time off to get through it. I know what he is capable of, which is why I'm a fan. However, I refuse to share the delusions that certain people want to use as an excuse in my opinion. I really hope he could one day show his true potential without anything holding him back.
Wergeland said:What are you talking about?
That's not criticism.luckyboy said:By that logic nobody is allowed to criticise anybody who is better than they are at doing something.
jilbiker said:AC said Samu was not fully there (legs wise) else they would have put more distance. AC had to balance keeping Samu with him for the descend or going full blast to distance Cadel and Samu. He chose to keep Samu which was a wise move. Besides it was just 3km left on the climb. I still don't think cuddles will holdup on an AC attack again and again and again, if that climb was 5 more km and there was no descend, story would have been very different.
But Cadel looks determined this year, he is 34, probably last chance so hey, go all out. AC is a very wise guy, I see this race being decided before A'dHuez. Stage 17&18 will be a lot of fun.
Maybe Andy's not the one who needs to grow up.red_flanders said:I'm glad you get the tutu was a joke.
I'll tell you what, there are a lot of people who see cycling as an athletic endeavor, one requiring skill, courage and risk-taking. Andy seems to want it to be a test of who processes oxygen best, and seems to want to take skill out of the equation–when it suits him. That's lame in a lot of people's opinion.
I don't care if he's better than I am, that's why he's getting paid, and paid well. You put your wares out in public for adoration, you put them out for criticism as well. Stop crying for Andy, he'll be fine.
I'll tell you right now there are a lot of crap riders without his engine who can descend better than he can and handle themselves publicly with a lot more class. Talent is not a get-out-of-jail free card from criticism.
I hear where you're coming from, but I think you're taking this all a bit too far.
Agreed, but does it really matter at this point? That he's even still in the GC picture at this point is amazing.Bennyl said:Voecklers days are definitely numbered now IMHO.
VeloCity said:And athletes, like all human beings, say dumb things sometimes. But instead of saying "ok, that was a dumb thing to say", it's pink tutu's and being called a p**sy, among other derogatory names, by people who don't have a fraction of his talent or have to go through what he goes through on a daily basis.
Calling someone a p**sy is not a joke, it's intended to be demeaning and derogatory.
I'm not a fan of Andy's.
You don't think it's a bit ridiculous for posters on an internet forum who couldn't for a second do what Andy does on a daily basis to be calling him a p***y?