just some guy said:By claiming that rider A would have won because rider B won, but rider A crashed out agruement. Is dumb and pointless.
Ie If Evans wins Gesink would have but he crashed arguement .
Going into the tour
Contador
Andy were ranked 1 and 2 if they dont win then who ever wins deserves the win no if or buts.
It is cr@p to say otherwise - my point
Im not saying Gesink would have won. Im saying Gesink is likely never going to get this kind of chance to win the Tour. Im not saying he would have but most Dutch fans here believe Gesink is a better Gc all rounder or at least very close, so a Tour where Evans actually wins, is one where Gesink had a far better chance than he is likely to get in the future.
As for Samu, if Evans didnt have a head start, i honestly have no idea where he will have gotten any time from Sanchez?
Also i have no idea why you need profanity.
"This is wrong" is a lot more pleasant to read when you are in discussion with someone than "this is bull****, it is total cr@p" etc.
Just saying.