rxgqgxnyfz said:He was alread in the red yesterday![]()
manafana said:christ that opening climb looks like a field killer, surely the bus misses the time tommorow.


Lexman said:LOL, if he doesn't deliver this Giro he will be a neverending promising but not delivering rider...might be a good gregario for Contador next year at Saxo in that case
You can attack before the last climb, you know...Lexman said:one thing i don't understand : why do start with a cat 1 climb and end with a cat 2 climb, it seems to me to toughen up the riders with the some cat 2 & 3 climbs and let them arrive on a cat 1 climb where since it's a cat 1 climb the gradients must be tougher
Lexman said:one thing i don't understand : why do start with a cat 1 climb and end with a cat 2 climb, it seems to me to toughen up the riders with the some cat 2 & 3 climbs and let them arrive on a cat 1 climb where since it's a cat 1 climb the gradients must be tougher
hrotha said:You can attack before the last climb, you know...
Personally I think most mountain stages should have a really tough climb followed by an easier one.
18-Valve. (pithy) said:They don't want this stage to be decisive, that's why.
Gah. Again, NOTHING TO DO WITH CLEANLINESS. Everything to do with attitude. Get that into your heads and stop being ripped off.Delicato said:Not in the times of "cleaner" peloton, you know. Schleck's performance last year was an exception, and uncoordinated chase did help him.
Delicato said:Not in the times of "cleaner" peloton, you know. Schleck's performance last year was an exception, and uncoordinated chase did help him.
DominicDecoco said:They can't all earn the same. But no one is overpaid in this sport. That's one thing certain.
But the thing is, we shouldn't need super tough stages for them to actually race. Yesterday's stage was perfect on paper.Libertine Seguros said:Mortirolo -> Aprica
Libertine Seguros said:Mortirolo -> Aprica
You are very polite, sir.hrotha said:Gah. Again, NOTHING TO DO WITH CLEANLINESS. Everything to do with attitude. Get that into your heads and stop being ripped off.
First mention of headwind I see.Delicato said:Hrotha, how yesterday's stage was perfect for fireworks? Especially with headwind. The first proper mountain stage most certainly never ends with something special.
I agree with you to an extent, but I think the conservative racing common to many early GT mountain stages is being accentuated in this Giro by the fact that all of the pre-race favourites are climbers first and foremost. They don't see themselves as having a need to attack (except Rujano, who went to the opposite extreme) because they are all close on GC, don't have time to make up, and don't fear anyone in the final TT. Hopefully the emergence of Hesjedal as a serious threat will change things, and we'll see some more aggressive racing from now on.hrotha said:First mention of headwind I see.
I've already mentioned this elsewhere, but... why does it matter that it's the first mountain stage? Why should it matter? It's stage 14 of a three-week race, and we already had Lago Laceno and some hills. Why should we accept that the first true mountain stage should be like the Champs Elysees stage, other that because we've been sadly accostumed to it?
Yesterday's stage had Joux (22.4 km, the last 5.5 km with a respectable 6.5%, the last 10 km being perfectly suitable to attack) followed by virtually no flat, leadig right to the Cervinia climb (27 km, of which the last 15 km were perfectly fine to attack). It was also a 200-km stage. How is this not almost ideal? Apparently everybody thinks you can't do anything unless the average gradient is 10%?
hrotha said:First mention of headwind I see.
I've already mentioned this elsewhere, but... why does it matter that it's the first mountain stage? Why should it matter? It's stage 14 of a three-week race, and we already had Lago Laceno and some hills. Why should we accept that the first true mountain stage should be like the Champs Elysees stage, other that because we've been sadly accostumed to it?
Yesterday's stage had Joux (22.4 km, the last 5.5 km with a respectable 6.5%, the last 10 km being perfectly suitable to attack) followed by virtually no flat, leadig right to the Cervinia climb (27 km, of which the last 15 km were perfectly fine to attack). It was also a 200-km stage. How is this not almost ideal? Apparently everybody thinks you can't do anything unless the average gradient is 10%?
