If I had gotten my way they wouldn't have gone to Denmark in the first place, or at least would have had a stage around Vejle.
Navardauskas got the jersey because of a TTT, so that's totally irrelevant. If I had my way, no race outside of the track would ever have one.
I wouldn't necessarily have a mountain stage straight away, but I would want some kind of selectivity early on. The 2008 Giro, which took nearly two weeks for a high mountain stage, had a selective uphill finish... on stage ONE. Giovanni Visconti still got a week in pink thanks to breakaways.
There is more than one way to skin a cat, Navardauskas and Malori didn't have to get the jersey the way they did, they could have got it another way.
Everybody makes the assumption that I would like 21 mountain stages in every GT. This is patently not the case. I just would like riders to actually have some kind of challenge to the GC men outside of week 3. Otherwise it's two weeks of playing around and giving outsiders a chance to wear the pink jersey, but ultimately two weeks of total irrelevance. Why would you need to watch it at all?
The whole idea of a Grand Tour lasting three weeks is that you race for three weeks. Not that you clap politely at the favourites going on training rides together for two weeks, then chasing each other around the mountains for a week. It's a three week race. Frankly it doesn't really feel like the GC battle for this Giro has even started yet, and it's stage 15. That's a joke.