auscyclefan94 said:
They would have to get those points at Beijing as I don't see them getting those points in any of the other races they compete in.
Don't agree. Cavendish is obviously a great asset but I don't see much worth in the others in the immediate future regarding wins. On the other hand look at a team like BMC.
Ins: Phillipe Gilbert, Thor Hushovd, Tejay van Garderen, Marco Pinotti, Klaas Lodewyck, Steve Cummings & Adam Blythe.
Outs: Karsten Kroon, Chad Beyer, Alexander Kristoff, Jeff Louder, John Murphy & Simon Zahner.
I could say the same sort of thing about Omega Pharma Quickstep or Movistar.
I'm shocked that you don't believe Sky upgraded much. Really, really shocked. Normally you are nothing but positive about them.
"Other" than Cavendish is a bit of a ridiculous statement. Let's be honest, other than being current World Champion, Green Jersey winner, best sprinter in the world, winner of 30ish GT stages, what has he really done anyway? Just MSR I guess.
Improving a team isn't only done from the top, it can just as effectively be done from the bottom and the middle. Adding Cav and Henao to the top of the roster, and the likes of Porte, Suitsou, Eisel, Pate to the middle makes them much improved. Buying wins isn't the only way to get wins.
As for what the "others" add result wise, together they had top 10 overalls in Giro and the Dauphine, 7th in Paris-Roubaix, 4th in Vuelta a Colombia, 2nd in Tour of Utah, and Porte, Suitsou, Pate, Eisel probably rode a total of 10 days for themselves all season long.
And I do wonder how many predicted wins BMC lose with Kristoff and Kroon leaving. It's definitely a lot.
BMC have certainly improved, but "other" than Evans and maybe Van Avermaet they didn't really have anyone to begin with. And yes, that was a deliberately hyperbolic and equally pointless point.