Parrulo said:considering he had a 15 minute head start on the eventual winner . . .
Add the 12'41'' he won to his GC time and he's 13th overall, just 2 seconds behind Mollema, in his first GT ever, in a race that was almost all climbing
Parrulo said:considering he had a 15 minute head start on the eventual winner . . .
Dekker_Tifosi said:1 - Porte
2 - Machado 8"
3 - Costa
4 - Hoogerland 23"
5 - Poels 24"
6 - Vandenbroeck
7 - Talansky 30"
8 - Mendes 34"
9 - Wiggins 39"
10 - Roche 43"
What differences already...
Porte vs Machado now.. and Porte is already the better itt-specialist. So he has this in the bag
Without the bonus time he would have never had the motivation to cling on and rise above himself...issoisso said:Add the 12'41'' he won to his GC time and he's 13th overall, just 2 seconds behind Mollema, in his first GT ever, in a race that was almost all climbing
Dekker_Tifosi said:1 - Porte
2 - Machado 8"
3 - Costa
4 - Hoogerland 23"
5 - Poels 24"
6 - Vandenbroeck
7 - Talansky 30"
8 - Mendes 34"
9 - Wiggins 39"
10 - Roche 43"
What differences already...
Porte vs Machado now.. and Porte is already the better itt-specialist. So he has this in the bag
Surprisingly Machado's tactics were crap. I didn't see that one comingKvinto said:funny that it was obviously Machado who provoked the attack
Dekker_Tifosi said:Without the bonus time he would have never had the motivation to cling on and rise above himself...
So he would never finished at that spot without the break.
He did show awesome climbing today though. Wow! (much much better than even his best climbing before)
Galaxy away..... Yeah sure. He's better but not way better.issoisso said:IMO, it'll be close between Machado and Costa in the TT. As for Porte, he's a galaxy away in TT talent.
woodenswan said:sky looked pretty impressive today
why is porte winning such a shock? he did show potential in the past
Richeypen said:Is that the GC or stage standings? Does Porte get another 10secs?
trevim said:Surprisingly Machado's tactics were crap. I didn't see that one coming
trevim said:Galaxy away..... Yeah sure. He's better but not way better.
trevim said:Surprisingly Machado's tactics were crap. I didn't see that one coming
Euskaltel! said:Porte has 50sec over Martin...
issoisso said:TTs, Porte vs Machado
Giro 2011, Porte wins by 30s over 26km
ENECO 2010, Porte wins by 41s over 17km
Romandie 2010, Porte wins by a minute over 23km
Porte is VERY good in the TT
Being the first to attack on a group that still had a few guys. He even admitted it was probably a bit to soon to goKvinto said:i think his tactics was surprisingly reasonable today, but Porte proved to be stronger
trevim said:Machado's interview:
"I thought I was the strongest in the group"
"Maybe I made a mistake by attacking too soon"
trevim said:Being the first to attack on a group that still had a few guys. He even admitted it was probably a bit to soon to go
trevim said:Is that a galaxy away?
I never said he wasn't very good. I know he's better. But Machado is good too and can put a good fight I think.
trevim said:Is that a galaxy away?
I never said he wasn't very good. I know he's better. But Machado is good too and can put a good fight I think.
woodenswan said:this does sound like Russian!
why are we calling them uk postal again?
 
		
		 
		
		 
		
		
 
				
		