auscyclefan94 said:I agree. Just imagine if I or someone else made such a thread? This is wrong.
If you made this thread we would like you even more
auscyclefan94 said:I agree. Just imagine if I or someone else made such a thread? This is wrong.
maltiv said:Most spanish riders are already out in the media defending Contador, because they know that's the only chance they have of winning a stage in their home tour - Contador has to let them win. I think that if he gifts a couple of stages to those of whom are faithful to him then he will only get a couple of stages (like 5) himself, but that's still a good revenge.
Even without the ban, Contador would've done (and won) the Vuelta. But the biggest positive in all this is that we'll get the chance to see a top motivated and fit Contador giving it everything to win the Worlds. It'll be a spectacle, that's for sure.
auscyclefan94 said:I agree. Just imagine if I or someone else made such a thread? This is wrong.
La Pandera said:I seriously doubt that the idea of being gifted a stage win by Contador is their motivation for defending Contador. You're kidding, right?
Fidolix said:NO it´s not annulled, and wouldn´t it be about time you had just a little foundation for all your predictions pisti, your comments in this thread is beginning to sound a little bit hysterical, get the facts straight first, it will save you a lot of grief, and maybe show a little bit more faith in the folks behind Saxo bank.
auscyclefan94 said:so basically things I did ages ago I am still accountable for ergo it makes it alright for someone else to make this thread?
DenisMenchov said:I hope he stays with Saxo, they fail to get WT status, and then don't get Tour 2013 invitation either.
The Hitch said:Unfortunately Im not sure if Contador will go for the Worlds. Hes been a real **** when it comes to one day races.
airstream said:Respect, Havetts. There is one man at least, who had no fear to say what he really thinks without covering by the slogans "tragedy of cycling", "cycling buried itself", "how to live without him??!" etc.
airstream said:Respect, Havetts. There is one man at least, who had no fear to say what he really thinks without covering by the slogans "tragedy of cycling", "cycling buried itself", "how to live without him??!" etc.
airstream said:I don't need anyone who cares about him. But it is really ridiculous how his fans (i don't mean you personally) try to belittle Schleck even more after announcing ban as though Schleck was guilty of Contador's catching. It looks like a stupid paranoid fan jealosy. If you are his fans, learn from him how to accept the things you cannot change with dignity.
warmfuzzies said:Contador will need to decide whether to continue riding professionally. 4 GT titles is a great career achievement, but he could probably win the Giro or Vuelta a few more times if he works hard and the top competitors focus on the Tour.
Publicus said:Are you have a semantics debate? AC is no longer under contract with Riis Cycling or Team Saxo Bank. When he returns, he will be free to contract with any other team that could find use for his services.
Fidolix said:Are you?
Get your facts straight buddy. Hes still on contract, period!!!
Hugo Koblet said:Uhm, no he's not...
Fidolix said:yes he is.
Or maybe you know more than Riis do?
Could be.
Hugo Koblet said:They just said on the press conference that Alberto is no longer on contract. Or did I miss something?
La Pandera said:Apparently the 2011 Tour didn't help you realize that a less than top form Contador or even no Contador at all is no guarantee that Andy will win the Tour. So 2012 will likely be just another grand disappointment for the Schleck camp. Maybe Andy will decide to give the Vuelta a try after failing at the Tour.........only to receive another smack-down by Contador.![]()
Oh the humanity!
Like:
-Andy and Chaingate/the 2010 Tour, which he just won't let go?
-Frank and the 2008 Tour and Sastre, which he just won't let go?
airstream said:Mr. La Pandera, that post is not about Schleck and relation of forces in duo Schleck/Contador. Contador could have won the TdF without the Giro, I admitted it easily in October Yet. It's all about an excessive dramatization of this case. The rider was caught, no matter how titled he is. He was banned. He was banned DESERVEDLY.
I don't justify them for that. Though it was absolutely natural human reaction after the Chaingate. Any rider would feel robbed in Schleck's place
Angliru said:Let me ask you, should Frank have received a ban for his relationship with a particular notorious doctor? He also was cleared by his federation but there was no appeal made by the UCI, inspite of his having paid said doctor for his services. It could be argued that he was cleared undeservedly. Based on how the two are virtually linked at the hip, it could be speculated that whatever transaction was taking place was for both brothers. They are certainly not without a bit of soil.
How can he feel robbed when he lost additional time in the prologue and ITT's? His focusing on the the time lost as result of his dropping his chain is, to me, an excuse to not take responsibility for losing to the better rider. Had he ridden against the clock,
TeoSheva said:Eddy (the new BMC's guy) said that Contador will win the vuelta with one day of advantage
![]()
airstream said:I don't justify them for that. Though it was absolutely natural human reaction after the Chaingate. Any rider would feel robbed in Schleck's place