2013 Tour de France, stage 17: Embrun / Chorges 32 km (ITT)

Page 13 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Nov 26, 2012
3,216
0
0
Sylvester said:
After inserting data of 40 riders it seems (time first TT x 1,4) is average.

Most GC men will like this TT so (time first TT x 1,35) is likely for guys like Contador, Kreuziger, and so on.

Hivert and Kittel did x 1,31 = best so far.

For the GC contenders:

Froome x 1,3 ==> 47:25; x 1,35 49:20; x 1,4 51:12, so 49-49:30 is to be expected. 51 would be very bad.
Contador and Mollema: 50ish would be great based on the first TT, 52 not so much.
Ten Dam will do 52-53 based on form.
Quintana: 51:30? Maybe a little faster, he might be capable of doing x 1,27 or so.



nice job with the math. at least the conclusion makes sense.
 
Nov 26, 2012
3,216
0
0
martin just 1sec off westra, though 10sec off de marchi.

This course may not suit him, but that doesn't mean that he is not going to try.
 
Pulpstar said:
I'd be amazed if Cav missed the cut. Hilariously Sky would be down to 5 men if he did though.

Nicely done :)

Opalius said:
:confused:

tencharcs



theyoungest said:
In what kind of parallel British universe do you live?

The Principal Sheep said:
Who?? Wha?? Really??

murali said:
this is 2013, not 2012


And good catch Cyiviel. Worked that out very quick.

Cyivel said:
Stannard and Lopez are slower than Cav (if that is what you were wondering about!)
 
Sylvester said:
After inserting data of 40 riders it seems (time first TT x 1,4) is average.

Most GC men will like this TT so (time first TT x 1,35) is likely for guys like Contador, Kreuziger, and so on.

Hivert and Kittel did x 1,31 = best so far.

For the GC contenders:

Froome x 1,3 ==> 47:25; x 1,35 49:20; x 1,4 51:12, so 49-49:30 is to be expected. 51 would be very bad.
Contador and Mollema: 50ish would be great based on the first TT, 52 not so much.
Ten Dam will do 52-53 based on form.
Quintana: 51:30? Maybe a little faster, he might be capable of doing x 1,27 or so.
Considering the two ITT are completely different I really doubt this stuff makes any sense. If Froome beats Westra's time by 6 minutes we won't have a forum anyway tonight so you'll not be able to tell us "told you so" :D
 
Nov 26, 2012
3,216
0
0
reg my earlier comment. i was saying that sky and cav shouldn't be confused now.

also, cav's current time is safe.

as far as dropping cav goes, sky can't afford to do it. think of the bad press it will create in UK.
 
May 28, 2012
2,779
0
0
murali said:
a very good ride from de marchi/

does this guy have any TT pedigree?

No, but he's an awesome rider. :)

This TT is all about freshness and climbing skills, since it's the third week of the Tour.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Pentacycle said:
No, but he's an awesome rider. :)

This TT is all about freshness and climbin skills, it's not your average TT.

de marchi is a former track italian pursuit rider and champion. also almost all his resutlsa re itt's
 
Listening to people say how technical it is, Im starting to think Froome wont win this. Murito will do very well.

Contador will get time on the descents if he doesn't crash but he is no nibali and froome is no wiggins.

Mollema could really solidify his 2nd place.
 
Nov 26, 2012
3,216
0
0
you mean being a good climber is enough in this course?

EDIT: OOPS: didnt see hte later comment/