Dear Wiggo said:There are 3 possibilties:
1. incomplete data (works for both years)
2. less doping (bahahahahhahahahaa ahem)
3. anti-doping is now less effective than it was in 1998 (most likely imo)
Positive tests registered on dopeology.com:
1998: 30 matches for your search
2013: 18 matches for your search
That's a 40% reduction in positive tests, despite the alleged increase in testing.
Dopers are improving year on year. Testing is not keeping up.
The problem with your raw numbers is LA never tested positive. Khol only tested positive once. etc.
The problem with your answer is that you try to read into my post things there werent. So, once again, Bennotti lied, I showed his lie.