Arnout said:It's the same as in the Tour a few years back. Cancellara said people should stop racing because of crashes (read: because the Schlecks crashed) and even though some people protested, the part of the peloton that wanted a neutralized stage immediately takes the moral high ground, basically implicitly or explicitly pointing to people that do want to race as anti-social *******s.
Quite similar to how a lot of society works nowadays.
Lupi33 said:I remember that, but Cancellara at least has some standing in the peloton
Captain Serious said:they just said on Aus tv they reckon the GC times will stop with one lap to go
/??True?
Arnout said:That does mean nothing when he was clearly in a position of conflicted interests. He took the moral high ground, but only because it was in his interest. I hate people like that. Hate hate hate them. Cancellara has just about redeemed himself by his riding since then but I can still get really worked up about that stage.
forkboy84 said:Well, if any stage was going to be neutralised I guess this is the best one for it, seeing as it's a totally pointless stage and unnecessarily dangerous one at that.
Still, it is a bit disrespectful for the fans who've turned out to see some racing in Bari.
Butterhead said:So you mean he read the race to perfection and took advantage of the situation to neutralize the stage so his captains could recover and didnt lose time, and knew he could get away with it course of the position he knew he had in the peloton?
I would call that rather smart and clever, and so is professional sport, you take advantage of every possibility that surfaces, if you want gentlemen agreements watch dart instead.
Arnout said:Sure from his point of view it was smart. I'm perfectly entitled to be annoyed by it though.
It's like Senna vs Prost. Was it smart by Senna to crash into Prost to win the world title? Of course it was. Doesn't mean I like moves like that.