Bavarianrider said:If they feel the need to start the Giro in a run down economic desaster state, why not simply go to southern italy
Or spain, or portugal . I don't know.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Bavarianrider said:If they feel the need to start the Giro in a run down economic desaster state, why not simply go to southern italy
Bavarianrider said:Pretty emebarassing if you ask me.
With all that talk of the Giro officials to do a start in Washington, New York or something like that. And now they end up in Dublin/Belfast. Oh boy
Zam_Olyas said:It will be the first foreign start for any Grand Tour since the implementation of a new UCI regulation prohibiting rest days on three-week Tours until the completion of at least seven days of racing
SafeBet said:Sorry, I'm not sure I understand.
This means they will take a flight straight after the third stage and then race the fourth stage the day after?
element said:You'd all change your tune if it was starting in your hometown! Can't wait for this, will be the first WT race I get to see.
Netserk said:PS: I also think it was terrible that the Worlds was in Copenhagen in '11.
Eshnar said:no, it means no one gives a flying f*ck about UCI rules
williamp78 said:I read that they wont be having a rest day between the third and fourth stages. Presumably just jumping on a few chartered flights from dublin to italy
williamp78 said:I read that they wont be having a rest day between the third and fourth stages. Presumably just jumping on a few chartered flights from dublin to italy
Cult Classics said:I'd put money on a TTT on the first day in Italy. Not only does that mean the riders won't need to be racing in the morning the next day, but the teams can arrange for the time trial bikes to be waiting for the riders in Italy. Meanwhile it gives the racing bikes an extra day to arrive.
And who wants to ride in the rain and colder than already is in Italy?
Everybody wants to milk the Sky cow.
I am from US and Giro does not belong here. Giro does not belong in Ireland either. If UCI want race there create a one week Tour of Ireland and make the teams go there.
Dazed and Confused said:yeah, a prologue around Newark would be great.
Dazed and Confused said:Italy with the best cycling terrain in the world wants to find roads in Ireland. Everybody wants to milk the Sky cow.
Zam_Olyas said:Me, i love murals so i love the belfast murals. I wish they could show that.
rhubroma said:Ok, but I was being ironic of course. I mean Belfast usually isn't considered one of the top tourist attractions in Ireland, nor is it exactly synonomus with urban charm - no offense to any from the city on here.
I understand all the symbolic and business reasons for holding it there, personally, though, I'd much rather it have been in the area around Cork, if it must begin in Ireland.
rhubroma said:As an aside, in a second article in the same daily, an interview with Stephen Roche, who lives between Antibes and Majorca (lovely places!), the Irish ex-champion says his son Nicholas is strong and this year with Contador at Saxo Bank will have some nice sadisfactions. Yet his other son, 14 year-old Alex, who has just started racing with a Nice based team - naturally on Carrera bikes - Roche claims is a phenomenon. "He's got the peddle stroke of athletes of talent. I'm sure he will win the Giro and Tour of 2024. You wanna bet?"
So there you have it, you heard it first hear.
rhubroma said:Ok, but I was being ironic of course. I mean Belfast usually isn't considered one of the top tourist attractions in Ireland, nor is it exactly synonomus with urban charm - no offense to any from the city on here.
I understand all the symbolic and business reasons for holding it there, personally, though, I'd much rather it have been in the area around Cork, if it must begin in Ireland.
element said:I agree that the Cork area is more typically Irish and has bigger hills/more rugged backdrops, but Belfast itself has a unique character and is quite befitting of the dramatic ethos of the Giro. Hopefully the prologue takes in some of the murals etc. Also, the road stage will probably go up the Antrim Coast Road and into the Glens of Antrim, which will make for some spectacular scenery and racing.
And yes, me being glad about the Giro coming here might be a bit selfish, but only in the same way as fans who pray for rain before Paris Roubaix, or who complain when there aren't enough mountain top finishes in a GT.
Armchair cyclist said:Fodor's listed Belfast as one of "The 21 places in the world to visit."
Most comments here seem to be 10-15 years out of date.
While I also know and like Cork more, it is Belfast who have come up with the cash, which is the only meaningful factor in determining stage locations.
Cavehill and Upper Springfield, and then a loop through the mountains of Mourne might not be selective among a field like the Giro, but will be a lot more scenic than many flatlands opening stages.
Just to be clear - you have gotten angry about someone guessing what may happen?Mad Elephant Man said:Another reason to be disgusted by the move.
These kind of stupid decisions make me so angry.
Now you are saying that your selfish interests are better than other peoples selfish interests, fair enough.Mad Elephant Man said:And to those saying it is good decision because they get to see racing, you are just putting your own selfish desires above the good of the Giro and the sport.
rhubroma said:Well, no offence, but my list of "21 places in the world to visit," if that be all, would not include Belfast. Although I'm sure you are correct about a certain perception being 10-15 years passé.
At any rate, the Giro will certainly afford an occasion to reformulate sensibilities toward Northern Ireland's capital.