Re: Re:
The Trek rider was Van Poppel apparently. I agree with your conclusion of events. I think this is why the peloton says the sprints were a bit safer when HTC were dominating the last 10km for Cavendish.
MotorRouleur said:Velolover2 said:A grey rider caused the crash. It has to be one of the Southeast riders.
No. Here's what happened; Trek's Alifaci was on the front, and pulled off, and another Trek takes over (don't know who; van Poppel, Coledan, Silvestre?), followed by Nizzolo (Trek). That Trek guy then starts constantly looking over his shoulders. And instead of taking a good, straight pull, he zig-zags all over the road!
He starts on the far left of the road, then drags the field to the far right side. He was slow enough that a swarm of 10-12 riders started moving up on the left side. Then, still on the front (with Nizzolo still on his wheel), and with the road slightly curving to the right, the Trek guy drifts back to the left and the swarm coming up on the left get squeezed.
A LottoJumbo rider brakes hard (either wheel clip, or to avoid the hedge), but manages to stay up and sprints to regain speed. But his sudden braking brings down a Southeast teammate of Petacchi's, and right behind him was a Trek (Alifaci) who fell the hardest, and fractured his elbow.
Then, the Trek guy drifts BACK to the right side, and gets overtaken by other trains, starting with Giant.
The Trek rider was Van Poppel apparently. I agree with your conclusion of events. I think this is why the peloton says the sprints were a bit safer when HTC were dominating the last 10km for Cavendish.