2015 tour de france stage 3, Antwerpen-Hoei 159.5km

Page 22 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 9, 2011
189
0
0
Re: Re:

Fight.The.Power said:
DFA123 said:
Fight.The.Power said:
They clearly need more ambulances then don't they ?

Yeah, because ambulances and trained medical staff grow on trees. :rolleyes:

There are already ambulances following the group and spread throughout the route - for both spectators and riders. It is a huge strain on the local services as it is.

A cycling race stopping for a few minutes really isn't the end of the world in such excpetional circumstances.

The point is this was not a massive crash like we have seen in the past and they had run out of ambulances. What they gonna do if it was a bigger crash ? Tend to those highest on GC first and get a taxi for the rest ?

I'm going to wait for them to stop everyone at the top of a mountain to let the field catch up again because the ambulances are too far away in case someone at the front falls on the descent.
 
Jul 11, 2013
3,340
0
0
Re:

Merckx index said:
Here’s my interpretation, FWIW. If there’s a major crash, all or most of the ambulances gather there. If there is a second major crash soon after, any ambulances that aren’t already at the first crash site—or any that went there but weren’t needed—go to the second site. At that point, there are no ambulances immediately available if there is a third crash. It’s not that all the ambulances are necessarily in use, that there weren’t enough ambulances to begin with. It’s that there are none close to the front of the race and able to attend to a third crash quickly. I think it was a result of a) two crashes very close in time; and b) each crash a major one, requiring multiple ambulances.

I concur with this...
 
Re: Re:

I don't care if it is piss poor or not. If there's no ambulances available, the race stops, no matter what. That's the rule. The fact that they might have few ambulances is another discussion (poor planning), it doesn't change the fact that they HAD to stop today.

Well this is something I can respond to. It's the biggest race in the world and it keeps doing things like a Primadonna.

Why were all the ambulances engaged, for a crash that, everything considered, was spectacular but not horrific?[/quote]
You don't know that. As far as we know, they had to deal with lot's of fractures and a guy was cut in 2. Still, it doesn't matter to the fact that they had to stop. No ambulances = race stops.

Why did they plan so poorly? It should be discussed after the race.[/quote]

No, this wasn't the case and I've see far worse crashes over the last 30 years.

At any rate, indeed they will be talking about this after the race.
 
Mar 11, 2009
4,235
3,529
21,180
Tinkoff helping to ensure that field is strung out to prevent having to battle for position and keep Contador safe from it
 
Mar 10, 2009
9,245
23
17,530
SeriousSam said:
The odds of Froome winning today, and for Quintana's career to play out like Andy's have increased dramatically

Too late for that since Quintana has actually won a grand tour on the road and a major stage race. Andy only has his LBL to show for his major on the road victories.