You would think it was an injury for Nibali, simply because regardless of the climb not necessarily suiting him, their is no way you would expect him to lose time to that many.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Flamin said:BigMac said:Flamin said:Dekker_Tifosi said:Well Costa is clearly injuredSafeBet said:Pinot as well. And Rui Costa even more.
Hm, thought he would have recovered by now.
He said after yesterday's stage that his leg had not gotten better at all and could only pray (paraphrasing here) that it wouldn't fail him completely. I think it's obvious, as in no other situation would he lose so much time on the Mûr.
Thanks for the info, but you could have told me that yesterday
sir fly said:Elaborate, please.arvc40 said:sir fly said:My firm impression is that Froome was fixed to the power data, and that the rest of the GC field rode with that in mind.
Also, the way Sky approached the ascent looks like they're tuning for tomorrow and trying to find perfect succession of their turns up the finishing ascent.
Lol................
I totally agree with your analysisMr.White said:Great win for Vuillermoz, he's going to be a force in Ardennes.
Dan Martin mistimed it, but still not sure if he would beat Vuillermoz.
Sagan and Valverde needed a strong teammate to hold it together till 200-300m. Didn't had that
Froome tried, but soon stopped. Didn't seem strong like at Mur de Huy
Contador didn't look bad, he apparently wanted to lead Sagan out with 400m to go, but Sagan blocked him accidentally!
Nibali bad. Alarm bell should ring in Astana.
And where the hell Purito disappeared at the finish?!
I don’t know. At a certain point at the start of the climb Kangert ( or some other Astana rider) tried to lead him to the front and he kept riding in the middle of the pack. That’s strange.Poursuivant said:You would think it was an injury for Nibali, simply because regardless of the climb not necessarily suiting him, their is no way you would expect him to lose time to that many.
franic said:Spending time on this forum I realize that Contador’s fanboys may be blind because of their idol, but at least they tend to know about cycling. On the contrary, Froome’s fanboys seem to be british lads who started watching cycling 3/4 years ago and can’t avoid filling the board with comments that are dubious at best.
franic said:Spending time on this forum I realize that Contador’s fanboys may be blind because of their idol, but at least they tend to know about cycling. On the contrary, Froome’s fanboys seem to be british lads who started watching cycling 3/4 years ago and can’t avoid filling the board with comments that are dubious at best.
Yes, it looks exactly like that to me.arvc40 said:sir fly said:Elaborate, please.arvc40 said:sir fly said:My firm impression is that Froome was fixed to the power data, and that the rest of the GC field rode with that in mind.
Also, the way Sky approached the ascent looks like they're tuning for tomorrow and trying to find perfect succession of their turns up the finishing ascent.
Lol................
Just sounds funny how you put it. Like a lab experiment.
franic said:I don’t know. At a certain point at the start of the climb Kangert ( or some other Astana rider) tried to lead him to the front and he kept riding in the middle of the pack. That’s strange.Poursuivant said:You would think it was an injury for Nibali, simply because regardless of the climb not necessarily suiting him, their is no way you would expect him to lose time to that many.
The even more knowledgeable are in the Clinic, you are welcome.franic said:Spending time on this forum I realize that Contador’s fanboys may be blind because of their idol, but at least they tend to know about cycling. On the contrary, Froome’s fanboys seem to be british lads who started watching cycling 3/4 years ago and can’t avoid filling the board with comments that are dubious at best.
But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
LaFlorecita said:But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
the forum has one.jelantikharryh said:LaFlorecita said:But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
Yes he is and it would be great if there was as reasonable Saxo fan as well
Warhawk said:Of note: Tejay's betting line for winning the TdF has dipped below Nibali's
harryh said:LaFlorecita said:But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
Yes he is and it would be great if there was as reasonable Saxo fan as well
franic said:Spending time on this forum I realize that Contador’s fanboys may be blind because of their idol, but at least they tend to know about cycling. On the contrary, Froome’s fanboys seem to be british lads who started watching cycling 3/4 years ago and can’t avoid filling the board with comments that are dubious at best.
Carols said:harryh said:LaFlorecita said:But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
Yes he is and it would be great if there was as reasonable Saxo fan as well
Yes Pricey is great and I think there are quite a few reasonable Saxo fans......
Dunno, he/she has been panicking a lot lately!dacooley said:the forum has one.jelantikharryh said:LaFlorecita said:But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
Yes he is and it would be great if there was as reasonable Saxo fan as well
i'm sorry, i should've said 'i know one at least'LaFlorecita said:Dunno, he/she has been panicking a lot lately!dacooley said:the forum has one.jelantikharryh said:LaFlorecita said:But you're also a very reasonable Sky fanPricey_sky said:Well I am British, but I've also been watching cycling almost half my life, which is not just 4 years as I am not 8 years old!
Yes he is and it would be great if there was as reasonable Saxo fan as well
Reasonable Contador/Saxo fans? Publicus is a name that comes to mind. Angliru? Jspear also
Fearless Greg Lemond said:The even more knowledgeable are in the Clinic, you are welcome.franic said:Spending time on this forum I realize that Contador’s fanboys may be blind because of their idol, but at least they tend to know about cycling. On the contrary, Froome’s fanboys seem to be british lads who started watching cycling 3/4 years ago and can’t avoid filling the board with comments that are dubious at best.