2016 Critérium du Dauphiné, 2.UWT, June 5-12

Page 76 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
May 9, 2014
5,230
108
17,680
Re: Re:

rune1107 said:
jilbiker said:
Beech Mtn said:
I hate to say it, but that slow-mo of Contador coming over the line reminded me of Lance during his comeback. Just looking old and tired.

I agree. I saw the same thing. Sad to say for a legend, he is out of his class. He has got to rethink the retirement thing, so we don't see a sad mess. He is perhaps 2 years beyond when he should have quit.

Winning a Giro last year? I agree that it didn't look great today, but to say that not retiring after 2014 was a mistake is a bit harsh no?

He was poor by his standards in the Giro last year. However, it's possible that was simply a result of him trying to keep reserves for the Tour, and he has looked stronger than what he showed last year.
 
Jul 7, 2015
1,681
354
11,180
Either Bertie had a bad day or else Froome and Porte had a thermo nuclear day. Bertie looked unstoppable at the MTT, wonder what happened. Dauphine never disappoints.
 
Feb 20, 2012
53,933
44,320
28,180
Don't really know why Porte was working with Froome. His chance of wheelsucking Froome to stage victory today.
 
May 9, 2014
5,230
108
17,680
Re: Re:

DFA123 said:
SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Andro said:
I'm not sure how many times Froome has to do his yo-yo bluff before people stop being surprised by it.

Froome vs. Quintana for the Tour.
I don't think it's a bluff; it's just efficient riding. He knows he's the strongest climber in the field; why go anaerobic and respond to attacks from weaker riders? He can just carrying on spinning at threshold, reel them in and then attack them decisively when they're already on the limit.

True, although wind matters even for climbs.
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.
 
Jun 27, 2013
5,217
9
17,495
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Andro said:
I'm not sure how many times Froome has to do his yo-yo bluff before people stop being surprised by it.

Froome vs. Quintana for the Tour.
I don't think it's a bluff; it's just efficient riding. He knows he's the strongest climber in the field; why go anaerobic and respond to attacks from weaker riders? He can just carrying on spinning at threshold, reel them in and then attack them decisively when they're already on the limit.

True, although wind matters even for climbs.
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.

That only works at speeds far higher than those reached climbing on a bike, though
 
Jun 4, 2009
1,373
856
12,680
Re: Re:

jilbiker said:
Beech Mtn said:
I hate to say it, but that slow-mo of Contador coming over the line reminded me of Lance during his comeback. Just looking old and tired.

I agree. I saw the same thing. Sad to say for a legend, he is out of his class. He has got to rethink the retirement thing, so we don't see a sad mess. He is perhaps 2 years beyond when he should have quit.

Yes..already year ago saw it too on slow mo finish line videos. Funny how people sense that tiredness in an effort there is compared younger athletes raw rage
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Andro said:
I'm not sure how many times Froome has to do his yo-yo bluff before people stop being surprised by it.

Froome vs. Quintana for the Tour.
I don't think it's a bluff; it's just efficient riding. He knows he's the strongest climber in the field; why go anaerobic and respond to attacks from weaker riders? He can just carrying on spinning at threshold, reel them in and then attack them decisively when they're already on the limit.

True, although wind matters even for climbs.
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.
Yeah, doesn't make too much sense. Perhaps it was a kind of insurance, just in case Froome cracked for some reason or couldn't close the gap, Henao could have sat on and won the stage.

Maybe they're just letting riders like Henao and Landa do what they want and go for stages here; it could be good to let them do their own race here and come into the TdF fully motivated to slave away for Froome.
 
May 9, 2014
5,230
108
17,680
Re: Re:

GuyIncognito said:
PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.

That only works at speeds far higher than those reached climbing on a bike, though

Marginal gains

Also not to mention Froome has to stick his nose into the wind despite having teammates. Again, not significant at gradients of 9% but still makes a marginal difference.
 
Jul 5, 2011
858
0
0
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Andro said:
I'm not sure how many times Froome has to do his yo-yo bluff before people stop being surprised by it.

Froome vs. Quintana for the Tour.
I don't think it's a bluff; it's just efficient riding. He knows he's the strongest climber in the field; why go anaerobic and respond to attacks from weaker riders? He can just carrying on spinning at threshold, reel them in and then attack them decisively when they're already on the limit.

True, although wind matters even for climbs.
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.
LOL! Plus he's breathing hard on your back, too funny.
 
Jul 1, 2013
1,952
0
0
PremierAndrew said:
arvc40 said:
Don't think Tour is over for Contador yet !. That was just a bad day.

It hasn't even started yet. People need to calm down

And for me, the fact that Porte held on shows me that Contador can and will do the same. Needless to say they are all great Athletes.
 
Jun 27, 2013
5,217
9
17,495
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
GuyIncognito said:
PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.

That only works at speeds far higher than those reached climbing on a bike, though

Marginal gains

Also not to mention Froome has to stick his nose into the wind despite having teammates. Again, not significant at gradients of 9% but still makes a marginal difference.

The effect is tiny at 300km/h, it's nothing at 15.
And to get even that tiny effect Henao had to be 2-3cm from touching Froome's back. He can't do that while riding a bike
 
People on here never learn ...one swallow doe snot a summer make..still along way to go before the Tour

That climb today suited Froome & Porte becasue it was not very long...they could do it at speed...Contador & Quintana are better on longer climbs
Dan Martin did all the pulling for that Yates twin to pip him at the end was not on...

As for SKY Landa is a great foil...definitley needs to go to the Tour ...Henao also looking very good

Not sure about Poels...his form looks dodgy to me
And of course Kwait not great he is ill
 
Feb 18, 2015
13,820
9,810
28,180
Re:

Pantani Attacks said:
Either Bertie had a bad day or else Froome and Porte had a thermo nuclear day. Bertie looked unstoppable at the MTT, wonder what happened. Dauphine never disappoints.
It really didnt surprise me. Contador is just a monster in hard TT's, he also was in front of froome after the first climb in the hard tdf TT 2013
 
Jun 27, 2015
712
380
10,680
multiple and non-stop attacks (hopefully resulting in breakaways) from Contador,Quintana,Verde,Nibali,Aru......every single stage
only way Froome cracks and Sky goes banana. Too much unpredictable data to handle for them


unfortunately, nobody would put their Tour in jeopardy (with the risk of finishing out of the top 10) for the greater good
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re: Re:

Gigs_98 said:
Pantani Attacks said:
Either Bertie had a bad day or else Froome and Porte had a thermo nuclear day. Bertie looked unstoppable at the MTT, wonder what happened. Dauphine never disappoints.
It really didnt surprise me. Contador is just a monster in hard TT's, he also was in front of froome after the first climb in the hard tdf TT 2013
Exactly, he can do a great hilly or mountainous ITT even when he's average. So the prologue meant nothing. Froome and Porte are just stronger, let's see if Contador can still find some form.
 
Jul 12, 2012
8,975
591
19,080
arvc40 said:
PremierAndrew said:
arvc40 said:
Don't think Tour is over for Contador yet !. That was just a bad day.

It hasn't even started yet. People need to calm down

And for me, the fact that Porte held on shows me that Contador can and will do the same. Needless to say they are all great Athletes.


To be fair I expected that from Porte today, he is consistently strong in week long races. The complete opposite of which is of course true in GT's.
 
May 11, 2013
13,995
5,289
28,180
Froome back to his old self, Porte back to Sky days, Contador back to 2013, Aru and Pinot going backwards. Quintana smiling somewhere in Colombia while chewing on a coca leaf.
 
May 15, 2011
45,171
617
24,680
Re:

HelloDolly said:
That climb today suited Froome & Porte becasue it was not very long...they could do it at speed...Contador & Quintana are better on longer climbs
Hate to say it but that really isn't true.
 
Re: Re:

PremierAndrew said:
DFA123 said:
SeriousSam said:
DFA123 said:
Andro said:
I'm not sure how many times Froome has to do his yo-yo bluff before people stop being surprised by it.

Froome vs. Quintana for the Tour.
I don't think it's a bluff; it's just efficient riding. He knows he's the strongest climber in the field; why go anaerobic and respond to attacks from weaker riders? He can just carrying on spinning at threshold, reel them in and then attack them decisively when they're already on the limit.

True, although wind matters even for climbs.
Sure, but Sky have surely made the calculations and worked out it's the best strategy. Putting your nose in the wind for half a minute on a climb has to be better than going deep into the red trying to follow the attack of a much more punchy rider like Martin.

What was the point of Henao following Contador instead of pacing Froome up when he dropped back?
If anything, having a cyclist behind you improves your aerodynamics, because the guy behind pushes air forward and increases the pressure of the air behind the guy in front, so the guy in front has a lower pressure differential pushing him back ie less air resistance.

lol... do you even ride, bro?
 
Nov 7, 2010
8,820
246
17,880
Re:

BigMac said:
Agreed. Mountain drafting is overrated.
That's a bit of a blanket statement. Surely it depends on many factors; such as gradient, wind direction, wind strength, the number and size of riders you are drafting behind, road surface etc...

Sometimes it will save loads of energy, sometimes very little.
 

TRENDING THREADS