- Aug 31, 2012
- 7,550
- 3
- 0
Yeah, I once thought it was Uran, who attacked (I got confused by the comentators), but the results clearly show it had to be Bettiol.Ruudz0r said:Anderis said:Holly crap, Bettiol top10 again. The guy is only 22 but has an impressive string of results recently.
Think he could have been on the podium if he didnt go for a 350-400 meter long headwind uphill sprint.
I fixed it for you.DFA123 said:No. He's clearly the better sprinter at the end of a hard race. At the end of a flat stage of a stage race, or a fairly easily ridden classic Sagan is way faster. At the end of a monument or tough, hilly race where Sagan have to work hard, GVA is better - always has been.SKSemtex said:DFA123 said:Van Avermaet is the stronger sprinter at the end of tough races with lots of climbing; always has been. Sagan can either work really hard in a race, or he can sprint well. He can't do both.Keram said:Gigs_98 said:I only watched the last 5 km, but damn that was exciting. Sagan with his old problem which cost him so many races this spring. Everyone expects him to close every gap but after that much work his sprint just isn't that good anymore so guys like GVA can beat him. Anyway I guess it's fair that Sagan won the first and Greg the 2nd race. Probably the two strongest guys there.
Sagan pulling a lot last two kilometeres. Typical Greg win against Sagan. You could see how superior is Sagan sprint compares to Greg at friday. But honestly I think that pursuivaints working together quite good. Sagan done most work though. Anyway that was a lot better race than Quebec as usual.lol . Trolling?
Fortunately Sagan also knows this; which is why he didn't wait for the sprint in his two big wins so far.
Echoes said:Greg took an awful lot of pulls too and is now superior to Sagan whenever the race is hard. The Slovak's absence in Rio is quite significant about the fact he cannot climb anymore. 3 years ago he attacked on Polytech and held through, now he's not able to outsprint Greg. In Quebec Greg was just too badly positioned.
DFA123 said:No. He's clearly the better sprinter at the end of a hard race. At the end of a flat stage of a stage race, or a fairly easily ridden classic Sagan is way faster. At the end of a monument or tough, hilly race where both riders have had to work hard, GVA is better - always has been.SKSemtex said:DFA123 said:Van Avermaet is the stronger sprinter at the end of tough races with lots of climbing; always has been. Sagan can either work really hard in a race, or he can sprint well. He can't do both.Keram said:Gigs_98 said:I only watched the last 5 km, but damn that was exciting. Sagan with his old problem which cost him so many races this spring. Everyone expects him to close every gap but after that much work his sprint just isn't that good anymore so guys like GVA can beat him. Anyway I guess it's fair that Sagan won the first and Greg the 2nd race. Probably the two strongest guys there.
Sagan pulling a lot last two kilometeres. Typical Greg win against Sagan. You could see how superior is Sagan sprint compares to Greg at friday. But honestly I think that pursuivaints working together quite good. Sagan done most work though. Anyway that was a lot better race than Quebec as usual.lol . Trolling?
Fortunately Sagan also knows this; which is why he didn't wait for the sprint in his two big wins so far.
Exactly, he was clearly strong enough to do that. These autumn races doesn't get much attention, but holy has he been money lately. He is top-20 WT ranking now - without a doubt the most unexpected on that list.Anderis said:Yeah, I once thought it was Uran, who attacked (I got confused by the comentators), but the results clearly show it had to be Bettiol.Ruudz0r said:Anderis said:Holly crap, Bettiol top10 again. The guy is only 22 but has an impressive string of results recently.
Think he could have been on the podium if he didnt go for a 350-400 meter long headwind uphill sprint.
At least he tried to win instead of bringing home a safe 4th or so.
He was dropped on the descent of Kemmelberg because of a trajectory error. He was strong.trucido said:SKSemtex said:No. He's clearly the better sprinter at the end of a hard race. At the end of a flat stage of a stage race, or a fairly easily ridden classic Sagan is way faster. At the end of a monument or tough, hilly race where both riders have had to work hard, GVA is better - always has been.DFA123 said:Keram said:Van Avermaet is the stronger sprinter at the end of tough races with lots of climbing; always has been. Sagan can either work really hard in a race, or he can sprint well. He can't do both.Gigs_98 said:Sagan pulling a lot last two kilometeres. Typical Greg win against Sagan. You could see how superior is Sagan sprint compares to Greg at friday. But honestly I think that pursuivaints working together quite good. Sagan done most work though. Anyway that was a lot better race than Quebec as usual.lol . Trolling?
Fortunately Sagan also knows this; which is why he didn't wait for the sprint in his two big wins so far.
I guess GvA missed the memo in G-W. I mean it must have be raced way to easy for him to miss the Vanmarcke/Cancellara/Sagan move no? Sagan also happened to win the sprint.
If it was raced 'hard' he would have definitely been there (and won).
Echoes said:Greg took an awful lot of pulls too and is now superior to Sagan whenever the race is hard. The Slovak's absence in Rio is quite significant about the fact he cannot climb anymore. 3 years ago he attacked on Polytech and held through, now he's not able to outsprint Greg. In Quebec Greg was just too badly positioned.
MichalJ said:Too badly positioned?? :lol: He was right behind Sagan and couldn't follow at all![]()
Alexandre B. said:He was dropped on the descent of Kemmelberg because of a trajectory error. He was strong.
Keram said:Next chapter of great rivalry will be written at Eneco. If Greg is participating.
90% of cobbled riders would fail horribly at the ardennes and vice versa.El Pistolero said:What more proof do you need that the cobbled classics have a better field, for one-day races, than the hilly classics?
Strade Bianche - Cancellara
Olympic Road Race - GVA
GP de Quebec - Sagan
GP Montreal - GVA
The likes of Valverde are lucky that the real big boys don't care for the Ardennes classics.![]()
F e r o x said:Van Avermaet was recovering from illness at Gent-Wevelgem (had to forfait E3!) and he still could follow the best up the Kemmelberg. So this was not your best example.
We've seen it many times, Sagan his sprint is totally gone when he works hard during a race. Van Avermaet produces the same sprint no matter how tough the race was.
And everybody knows Sagan is much faster on a flat easy sprint then GVA. This is not the discussion.
PS: I know Sagan likes to ride full gass, but this was just plain stupid. Every single one was pulling in that group. There was no reason to keep riding at the front for so long. It was like he wanted Van Avermaet to win.
Red Rick said:90% of cobbled riders would fail horribly at the ardennes and vice versa.El Pistolero said:What more proof do you need that the cobbled classics have a better field, for one-day races, than the hilly classics?
Strade Bianche - Cancellara
Olympic Road Race - GVA
GP de Quebec - Sagan
GP Montreal - GVA
The likes of Valverde are lucky that the real big boys don't care for the Ardennes classics.![]()
Echoes said:MichalJ said:Too badly positioned?? :lol: He was right behind Sagan and couldn't follow at all![]()
No he definitely was not in his wheel at the start of the Quebec sprint. You had the same gap at start and finish. His fault though. He was in the wheel in Montreal. Difference in result is there.
By the way, Greg was back from sickness at Wevelgem, if I remember well.
25.03.2016El Pistolero said:When's the last time you saw a climber or hilly classic specialist win a cobbled race?
El Pistolero said:What more proof do you need that the cobbled classics have a better field, for one-day races, than the hilly classics?
Strade Bianche - Cancellara
Olympic Road Race - GVA
GP de Quebec - Sagan
GP Montreal - GVA
The likes of Valverde are lucky that the real big boys don't care for the Ardennes classics.![]()