The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Irondan said:Teej attacking? lol, when's the last time anyone has seen an attack by Teej in any race on the calendar?
I don't think that's really an option...
saganftw said:quintana is only 26,he will win his fair share of Tours...he just needs them marginal gains
You can't blame them, for them having Mollema on the podium would already be a huge success.arvc40 said:Trek manager just addmited they are happy where they are in GC.
carton said:True, looks are often indicative of not much. And yeah, looking closely at it maybe Ritchie was cooked. Rewinding, I thought the feint by Froome might have been telling. It seemed to me only Quintana, Bardet and Mollema were alert to it, and Mollema immediately relaxed as soon as he made out it wasn't for real. Bardet, as we found out, had more heart than legs today. But Quintana kept himself primed for a few extra beats before relaxing. I think he had a little left, just not more than Froome. If Quintana wanted to settle for another second he could've put in a half-hearted attack and then worked with Froome to gap the rest. Maybe that would entertain some folks here? It would effectively end the MJ contest but at least you would get to see GC attacks that stuck?movingtarget said:Porte looked pretty tired on the last climb as well. Even Froome did not look that great but it's hard to tell by looks. Quintana never looks tired but obviously he is.
And by the way, congrats to Pantano. That's the way you win. He wasn't the strongest rider today, but he exploited his advantages (downhills, sprint), didn't wheelsuck, got a great win. Chapeau.
l.Harm said:I already don't like Sky having the command all the time, but I hate it when he's talking to Aru when Astana's riding. Mind your own business.
Mayomaniac said:You can't blame them, for them having Mollema on the podium would already be a huge success.arvc40 said:Trek manager just addmited they are happy where they are in GC.
Movistar on the other hand, if Quintana wasn't feeling very well than I can understand them, otherwise...
At least Astana tried something, but the Skytrain looked almost as strong as the one that we saw in 2012.
Poels should crack on a few stages ( in a gt he's usually only really strong on 2-3 stages with steep climbs) and Nieve should fade a bit in the 3rd week, but I Landa will probably be stronger in the Alpes and I don't expect Henao to have many bad days.
Dekker_Tifosi said:In the Giro we had a GC leader who had no team.papisimo98 said:I miss the Giro.
What a contrast from racing to win to racing not to lose.
7-8 man teams would at least spread the talent around to other teams. Yet I could envision the richest teams still having the best talent just unable to take them all to the Tour.
But it's a start. Reminds me of Postal days.
bigcog said:Sky's budget is less than BMC's and Tinkoff's if I remember correctly.
damian13ster said:l.Harm said:I already don't like Sky having the command all the time, but I hate it when he's talking to Aru when Astana's riding. Mind your own business.
Maybe they were discussing the weather, Nice attacks, Turkey, macroeconomic situation in Europe, Brexit, US elections, who knows??? Are the riders just supposed to shut up for 6 hours and just talk in a small group?
so much hurt in 2 postsDFA123 said:Agreed, it's such joyless racing. Then every now and again Froome will pull out a circus trick which looks great in a Vine or a GIF- allowing the July fans to eulogise about him. And ASO will be happy because they get the dramatic bits put into a five minutes highlights package which are shown on newspaper sites and global news all around the world.Põhja Konn said:Most irritating part of Sky's performance today for me was how they interferred with the fight for lower places on the podium and top five. By bringing back Aru and then Bardet, they did all the work Trek, Orica and BMC should have done, just because they could. And that is also the main reason structural changes (salary caps, smaller teams etc) are needed here and now. Such excessive amount of strenght in one team not only kills entertainment, but more importantly, has undue influence over the parts of the race of which that team has no direct interest in.
No team should be able to control an entire stage, regardless of its nature, let alone an entire GT.
But the real cycling fans who watch hours of each stage, looking forward to all the details of the race, all the mini-battles, are just left absolutely cold by the lack of competition and suffocating control over the race.
rhubroma said:This race is sorely missing an in form Contador. What ennui.
arvc40 said:rhubroma said:This race is sorely missing an in form Contador. What ennui.
Yep, just having him there adds to the race. Certainly makes race more prestigious for whomever wins GC
arvc40 said:damian13ster said:l.Harm said:I already don't like Sky having the command all the time, but I hate it when he's talking to Aru when Astana's riding. Mind your own business.
Maybe they were discussing the weather, Nice attacks, Turkey, macroeconomic situation in Europe, Brexit, US elections, who knows??? Are the riders just supposed to shut up for 6 hours and just talk in a small group?
Mmmm it's all a bit to nice though. If I was playing Tennis against Sharapova I would tell that *** to shut up ! Lol.
Contador would've done what Aru did today. Only difference being afterwards he would either gotten dropped or crashed on the descent, like he's done the last six tours.rhubroma said:arvc40 said:rhubroma said:This race is sorely missing an in form Contador. What ennui.
Yep, just having him there adds to the race. Certainly makes race more prestigious for whomever wins GC
Well that depends on his form. At any rate, in form he would have given a spectacle.
movingtarget said:bigcog said:Sky's budget is less than BMC's and Tinkoff's if I remember correctly.
That can't be right. Sky has a massive budget which is why they can afford so many quality domestiques and a multiple Tour winner.
carton said:Contador would've done what Aru did today. Only difference being afterwards he would either gotten dropped or crashed on the descent, like he's done the last six tours.rhubroma said:arvc40 said:rhubroma said:This race is sorely missing an in form Contador. What ennui.
Yep, just having him there adds to the race. Certainly makes race more prestigious for whomever wins GC
Well that depends on his form. At any rate, in form he would have given a spectacle.
bigcog said:movingtarget said:bigcog said:Sky's budget is less than BMC's and Tinkoff's if I remember correctly.
That can't be right. Sky has a massive budget which is why they can afford so many quality domestiques and a multiple Tour winner.
There was a big forum discussion about it, either on here (clinic maybe) or bike radar. Figures quoted definitely showed BMC and Tinkoff was bigger I think.
bigcog said:movingtarget said:bigcog said:Sky's budget is less than BMC's and Tinkoff's if I remember correctly.
That can't be right. Sky has a massive budget which is why they can afford so many quality domestiques and a multiple Tour winner.
There was a big forum discussion about it, either on here (clinic maybe) or bike radar. Figures quoted definitely showed BMC and Tinkoff was bigger I think.
rick james said:so much hurt in 2 postsDFA123 said:Agreed, it's such joyless racing. Then every now and again Froome will pull out a circus trick which looks great in a Vine or a GIF- allowing the July fans to eulogise about him. And ASO will be happy because they get the dramatic bits put into a five minutes highlights package which are shown on newspaper sites and global news all around the world.Põhja Konn said:Most irritating part of Sky's performance today for me was how they interferred with the fight for lower places on the podium and top five. By bringing back Aru and then Bardet, they did all the work Trek, Orica and BMC should have done, just because they could. And that is also the main reason structural changes (salary caps, smaller teams etc) are needed here and now. Such excessive amount of strenght in one team not only kills entertainment, but more importantly, has undue influence over the parts of the race of which that team has no direct interest in.
No team should be able to control an entire stage, regardless of its nature, let alone an entire GT.
But the real cycling fans who watch hours of each stage, looking forward to all the details of the race, all the mini-battles, are just left absolutely cold by the lack of competition and suffocating control over the race.