The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
But that was after his teammate had already opened up a 30 second gap....Alexandre B. said:A rare picture of Richie Porte trying something.
Zinoviev Letter said:honzzz said:Kreuziger seems to be in better form and still has some chance to get on the podium.
Kreuziger is in better form than Contador, but his only chance of a podium will be if half a dozen other GC riders all get crushed under giant inflatable arches.
Alexandre B. said:A rare picture of Richie Porte trying something.
movingtarget said:aarononymous said:It looked like Quintana may have panicked and dropped his bottle when Froome attacked, perhaps he was looking for a teammate as he didn't want to go solo without water? Definitely saw a bottle fall but maybe that was his empty. Of course he would want Bala for support as well.
I think that was the bottle he took, he had one sip and then saw Froome go and threw the bottle away.
Zinoviev Letter said:Some spectators are extremely annoying, but sooner or later a weedy cyclist punching a civilian is going to get his teeth knocked out in response.
Pinot had a teammate stay with him yesterday, and I was a little uneasy that Seb didn't drop to assist as well. Then last night, Madiot and Pinot made it clear that the goal had changed. So today, no issues for me. And now that it's clear that Reichenbach can top-15 at best, the plan may change...imo nothing comparable to Tinkov's situation, with no less than Contador as the leader. A leader who gets no help whatsoever, see stage 5 and again today. I don't blame Kreuziger for what he did today and remaining a viable GC option. How about telling Majka to stop doing his own thing and help Roman? And telling Bertie that he should stop here, that he's not the leader anymore, that he won't get help. Maybe these talks took place, but that sure isn't Tinkov's party line. It's the team hypocrisy (or what I perceive as hypocrisy) that bothers me.Kokoso said:Same reason why Tonton was bashing FDJ for not waiting for Pinot. Wait, what, he didnt? Then don't try to find other reason than unreasonability.
Beobachter said:Zinoviev Letter said:Guybrush said:Zinoviev Letter said:Guybrush said:Kudos to Meintjes. Also Buchmann, this could be a breakthrough performance at gc level
Why kudos to Buchmann? Seriously, I like the kid, but nobody should get kudos for burying himself to move from 30th to 25th on GC. That's just total insanity. Has someone told him that there's an opening in the sport for a new Francis De Greef?
These are not GC positions anyone should be fighting for, ever.
well, he's a young lad and he is testing himself, nothing wrong with that. Sure he's in the 20's GC group but it's part of a normal learning curve
I'm fine with him testing himself, but by the time today's stage had started he'd already tested himself and come up short on both the prior mountain and the hilly stages and should be well aware that nothing worthwhile is possible on GC. Instead he's burying himself to fight his way from 28th to 23rd with the longer term aim of cracking 20th. None of those positions mean anything. He's fighting to move past riders who are only accidentally up that high because they are their leader's last domestique and aren't even paying attention to their own times.
He should be dumping time, saving energy and then testing himself in the break on climbing stages. That would be a worthwhile test and one that if he passes it brings worthwhile rewards. 23rd place is not a worthwhile reward. It is meaningless. 23rd and 123rd are equally without interest.
He arrived 15th today, this after a real mountain stage. Don't you think he can find some motivation in following the best riders in the best race of the world? Why do you want him to lose on purpose time? He's indeed here to see what he's able of. His final ranking is in no way important; what is important is to see what he will do, until which level he's able to go. It's a normal phase to see if he has a future as GC rider.
You speak about going for stage hunting. But Buchmann is not a rider like that, he has basically no jump at all. His probability of a stage victory is very very low. Especially because he has big troubles if it comes to fight at the beginning, he needs to warm up. And it becomes better and better during the stage. He has always had some troubles at the beginning. Joining a breakaway group is therefore difficult for him, since it doesn't match his qualities.
Let him go as he wants, earning some experience for the future is the thing to do! But losing time on purpose for a rider like him would be one of the most silly thing I've heard recently in a perspective of his development....
I think that holds true for very short TTs, prologues. Problem is as he is not leader he doesnt train TT much.movingtarget said:He rode well but I don't see him being that strong in the third week and his TT is not as good as it was when he was younger.
In his place Sagan or Roman could use a helper.LaFlorecita said:Why is he a liability? A waste of bottles, rice cakes and gels or what?DFA123 said:Unfortunately I have to agree with all of this. Contador is a liability at the moment. Tinkoff is actually having a decent tour: Sagan is on fire as usual, Majka leading the KOM and Kreuziger going well in the GC. This side showing surrounding Contador needs to stop.
Sure, he's the most talented GC rider on the team and the nominal leader. But he's clearly way below the performance level needed, for whatever reason. The team is 100% correct to change their priorities.
He's just "there". Hanging on at the back trying to lose as little time as possible. I don't see how that qualifies him as a "friggin burden" or a liability.
arvc40 said:Alexandre B. said:A rare picture of Richie Porte trying something.
Probably soft pedaling, slowing pace of group for his team mate ahead. Superb ride by Porte.
I'm sorry I got to far here. But did Contador not have other, say possible, teammate there too? It's a pointless discussion though. Kreuziger's radio wasn't working, it is not his fault nor anyone else probably. Just bad luck.Tonton said:Pinot had a teammate stay with him yesterday, and I was a little uneasy that Seb didn't drop to assist as well. Then last night, Madiot and Pinot made it clear that the goal had changed. So today, no issues for me. And now that it's clear that Reichenbach can top-15 at best, the plan may change...imo nothing comparable to Tinkov's situation, with no less than Contador as the leader. A leader who gets no help whatsoever, see stage 5 and again today. I don't blame Kreuziger for what he did today and remaining a viable GC option. How about telling Majka to stop doing his own thing and help Roman? And telling Bertie that he should stop here, that he's not the leader anymore, that he won't get help. Maybe these talks took place, but that sure isn't Tinkov's party line. It's the team hypocrisy (or what I perceive as hypocrisy) that bothers me.Kokoso said:Same reason why Tonton was bashing FDJ for not waiting for Pinot. Wait, what, he didnt? Then don't try to find other reason than unreasonability.
So are you saying Tinkoff should have known before the race that Contador would crash twice and would be too injured to play a role in the GC?MacBAir said:In his place Sagan or Roman could use a helper.LaFlorecita said:Why is he a liability? A waste of bottles, rice cakes and gels or what?DFA123 said:Unfortunately I have to agree with all of this. Contador is a liability at the moment. Tinkoff is actually having a decent tour: Sagan is on fire as usual, Majka leading the KOM and Kreuziger going well in the GC. This side showing surrounding Contador needs to stop.
Sure, he's the most talented GC rider on the team and the nominal leader. But he's clearly way below the performance level needed, for whatever reason. The team is 100% correct to change their priorities.
He's just "there". Hanging on at the back trying to lose as little time as possible. I don't see how that qualifies him as a "friggin burden" or a liability.
Eclipse said:LosBrolin said:Zinoviev Letter said:Dan Martin looked surprisingly strong on the climb. Stayed consistently with Froome, Henao and Quintana when others were yo-yoing.
Exactly. Seems like his move to Andorra and training with longer climbs is really paying off.
Martin is like Porte to me. Can't believe in a 3 week performance until it actually happens
bassano said:I think lot of you just overrate froome attack, it was not great action at all, nice interesting and unpredictable of course, but attack on top climb only to push hard on straight descent is not anything legendarry or memorable and he did not liquidated any concurence by that
bassano said:I think lot of you just overrate froome attack, it was not great action at all, nice interesting and unpredictable of course, but attack on top climb only to push hard on straight descent is not anything legendarry or memorable and he did not liquidated any concurence by that
I just meant a liability in terms of stopping the team from getting the most out of the Tour - IF he were to insist on riders like Majka and Kreuziger slaving for him all day.LaFlorecita said:Why is he a liability? A waste of bottles, rice cakes and gels or what?DFA123 said:Unfortunately I have to agree with all of this. Contador is a liability at the moment. Tinkoff is actually having a decent tour: Sagan is on fire as usual, Majka leading the KOM and Kreuziger going well in the GC. This side showing surrounding Contador needs to stop.
Sure, he's the most talented GC rider on the team and the nominal leader. But he's clearly way below the performance level needed, for whatever reason. The team is 100% correct to change their priorities.
He's just "there". Hanging on at the back trying to lose as little time as possible. I don't see how that qualifies him as a "friggin burden" or a liability.
He told Kreuziger to go for GC for himself and clearly Majka already had a free role - what more can he do? Should he start slaving for them or what?DFA123 said:I just meant a liability in terms of stopping the team from getting the most out of the Tour - IF he were to insist on riders like Majka and Kreuziger slaving for him all day.
Of course, if he is prepared to just ride by himself, with no real team support, he's not a liability whatsoever. In fact, if he recovers he could be of great assistance to Sagan, Majka and Kreuziger in their aspirations - and could even get a stage win himself.
At the moment though, he is a liability as a team leader. Most of the team should really get behind Sagan now, with Kreuziger and Majka having free roles to do their thing.
Would be nice if he could put his ego aside and give something back to someone as loyal as Kreuziger. But I don't think we should hold our breath on that.LaFlorecita said:He told Kreuziger to go for GC for himself and clearly Majka already had a free role - what more can he do? Should he start slaving for them or what?DFA123 said:I just meant a liability in terms of stopping the team from getting the most out of the Tour - IF he were to insist on riders like Majka and Kreuziger slaving for him all day.
Of course, if he is prepared to just ride by himself, with no real team support, he's not a liability whatsoever. In fact, if he recovers he could be of great assistance to Sagan, Majka and Kreuziger in their aspirations - and could even get a stage win himself.
At the moment though, he is a liability as a team leader. Most of the team should really get behind Sagan now, with Kreuziger and Majka having free roles to do their thing.
I am sure he will support Kreuziger if he feels he deserves it, like when he rode for Mick at the 2013 Dauphiné. We will see what happens. I personally expect him to ride for himself.DFA123 said:Would be nice if he could put his ego aside and give something back to someone as loyal as Kreuziger. But I don't think we should hold our breath on that.
Carols said:bassano said:I think lot of you just overrate froome attack, it was not great action at all, nice interesting and unpredictable of course, but attack on top climb only to push hard on straight descent is not anything legendarry or memorable and he did not liquidated any concurence by that
I dislike the guy but even so will admit it was one darned Bold Move! No not legendary, but impressive none the less.