Re:
Breh said:
Montagne de Lure. climb Ventoux twice. Start from Sault, descent to Bedoin from Chalet Reynard and then climb it from Malaucène again.
These three options have been put forward in another thread.
Yeah, I came up with
this for a hard version of a Ventoux stage. Problem is, Montagne de Lure is just too far away from Ventoux and the Sault side is much easier than the other two. But it could be done if the interest was there. Heck, wouldn't be surprised to see Bedóin-Summit-Malaucène and Bedóin again in the near future like Huez-Sarenne...
Regarding the route. It's a bit of a marmite thing innit? I'm going to risk saying I like it, but would like to see even more medium mountain. For me it goes like this:
+Lioran stage. Hard finish. Good for baroudeur types
+Pau-Luchon. Looks like a classic Queen Stage to me. Many might disagree but it's a quick succession of difficult climbs that you don't get elsewhere.
+GC stage. Proper sawtooth half stage for a knockout finish.
+ Steeper climbs overall - Finhaut, GC, Bisanne, first half of Le Bettex, Joux Plane, Ventoux. Like to see the TDF using one of the Giro's strengths. I would love to see more of this style of climb. It's the complete opposite from La Toussuire, Glandon, Galibier types. Both have their place though.
+- Andorra stage - Arcalis is uninspired. But I'm holding my breath this time. It's before the rest day. If Beixalis is properly raced it could be amazing.
- Lack of more pure medium mountain stages (see Saint Flour - the Hoogerland stage and Porrentruy).
- Finhaut-Emosson with no preceding climbs. It's like a second Ventoux stage. Nothing preceding it, and Martigny has its' options. (I want a Lein, Champex loop, mwahahaha).
- Misuse of Signal de Bisanne. Too far from the finish...
- Questionable MTT instead of a hilly one since we're going shorter and less flat on TTs otherwise...
- Ventoux may be slightly overused...