BigMac said:
Valv.Piti said:
Suisse often has pretty poor racing compared to Dauphine, imagine Contador, Froome, Bardet, Porte etc. duking it out on these gradients. So yes, most of the times it definitely means better racing IMO.
Not true. There's a reason those smaller races with few to no big guns are often much more entertaining and attacked. The reason this race is looking dreadful is because of the parcours. 2014 was pretty entertaining and, even though there were still 3 GC stages back to back, it had no real big names innnit. The big guns also missed the move which made the 2014 Dauphiné so good. This race parcours has nothing redeemable, not even all the Contadors of this world could turn it into a nice race. You'd still have a group of favourites strolling together to the line. A smaller one, but a group regardless. Those names you mention are not immune to stage backloading. The smartest thing for a rider to do here is to attack the least possible
2014 and 2015 Dauphine were classes above Suisse in those same years. Simply put. The Contador v Froome duel in 2014 was epic and is brought up almost on a daily basis, pretty big testament to the racing.
Froome was behind in 2015 and the went after it the last 2 stages. Someone probably founds it boring, but I really enjoy the Sky-trains when Froome is up to it instead of the soft-pedalling, pointless weak attacks etc. we often otherwise gets to see on MTFs. Not mentioning the extremely good stage to Vercors including Nibali, Costa, Valverde etc.
Ill take big names above everything else. Not necessarily because the racing is super much better if at all, it can be argued, but its always much more fun (to me) to see the big guns. Now, I know that you are somewhat of a cycling hipster (is it ok to call you that?) based on the many posts I've read of yours in the last year, so obviously you would disagree with me here.