Re: belle confuso
I don't know if we're talking about the same thing? The guy who I adressed had initially answered another poster who complained about the horrendous production of the final 500 metres where we saw almost the whole front group pass by not one but two still cameras (which is all I have been talking about). Saying that it's fine that this is badly done because it reflects Italian nature is gibberish in my ears which is why I responded.
I think the info boxes you talk about are useless as they are now, but if somebody with a rudimentary understanding of physiology and cycling could make them a little more relevant (ie add a maximal heat rate, normalise the power output to longer periods etc.), I think they could be a nice addition to the production.
And hey, they have cracked the code of transmitting live pictures from inside tunnels so it's not like everything is bad at all!
Dazed and Confused said:I think your view is too narrow.
One thing I could do without is the tech babble interfernce about bpm etc. Now that sort of stuff destroys a good tv production.
I don't know if we're talking about the same thing? The guy who I adressed had initially answered another poster who complained about the horrendous production of the final 500 metres where we saw almost the whole front group pass by not one but two still cameras (which is all I have been talking about). Saying that it's fine that this is badly done because it reflects Italian nature is gibberish in my ears which is why I responded.
I think the info boxes you talk about are useless as they are now, but if somebody with a rudimentary understanding of physiology and cycling could make them a little more relevant (ie add a maximal heat rate, normalise the power output to longer periods etc.), I think they could be a nice addition to the production.
And hey, they have cracked the code of transmitting live pictures from inside tunnels so it's not like everything is bad at all!