• The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

2017 Tour of Flanders / Ronde Van Vlaanderen - April 2, 260k

Page 48 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.

So, who wins?

  • Démare

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Lotto Soudal

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Kristoff

    Votes: 3 2.0%
  • Sagan

    Votes: 64 42.7%
  • Degenkolb

    Votes: 5 3.3%
  • Van Avermaet

    Votes: 33 22.0%
  • Durbridge

    Votes: 4 2.7%
  • Gilbert

    Votes: 22 14.7%
  • Quickstep other than Gilbert

    Votes: 6 4.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 11 7.3%

  • Total voters
    150
  • Poll closed .
Re: Re:

Volderke said:
jflemaire said:
Volderke said:
wayahead said:
shalgo said:
Naesen hits the same jacket that Sagan hit and independently falls--he is actually going down before Van Avermaet does.
It really seems like Naesen fell independently of Sagan. Like he didn't see those sticking out barriers feet.
Naesen fel because Sagan made that jacket move with his shifter.
Naesen fell because he was riding too close to the barriers. Same for GVA and Sagan. I have clear memories of Gilbert riding alone in the dead centre of the road. Not saying he never rode close to the public but it seems to me he was doing it far less often.
GvA fell because Sagan fell, not because he was ever close to the barriers. GvA always kept half a meter distance. Check the video.
Which is pointless. If you want to avoid a crash due to riding too close to the barrier it makes no sense to sit right on the wheel of someone who does just that. That he fell is his own fault as much as Sagan's.
 
Re:

Flamin said:
No. Sagan was putting the hammer down. Not one single rider would chose the other side in that situation. 100% Sagan's fault.
That's Van Avermaet's problem then. If you choose to ride directly behind a rider who is taking a risk by riding close to the barriers you willingly take that same risk. There would have been no risk if he had been in front of Sagan, if he wasn't able to do that, that too is his problem.
 
Re: Re:

kingjr said:
Flamin said:
No. Sagan was putting the hammer down. Not one single rider would chose the other side in that situation. 100% Sagan's fault.
That's Van Avermaet's problem then. If you choose to ride directly behind a rider who is taking a risk by riding close to the barriers you willingly take that same risk. There would have been no risk if he had been in front of Sagan, if he wasn't able to do that, that too is his problem.

Riding in the peloton is also a risk. That's bike racing. Can't ride 50m behind the peloton all day and expect to win. Doesn't mean you're at fault when someone in front of you makes a judgemental error.
 
Re: Re:

Flamin said:
kingjr said:
Flamin said:
No. Sagan was putting the hammer down. Not one single rider would chose the other side in that situation. 100% Sagan's fault.
That's Van Avermaet's problem then. If you choose to ride directly behind a rider who is taking a risk by riding close to the barriers you willingly take that same risk. There would have been no risk if he had been in front of Sagan, if he wasn't able to do that, that too is his problem.

Riding in the peloton is also a risk. That's bike racing. Can't ride 50m behind the peloton all day and expect to win. Doesn't mean you're at fault when someone in front of you makes a judgemental error.
No, but you could surely ride on the right side on the Kwaremont and expect to win.
 
Mar 15, 2016
520
0
0
Visit site
Re: Re:

kingjr said:
Flamin said:
kingjr said:
Flamin said:
No. Sagan was putting the hammer down. Not one single rider would chose the other side in that situation. 100% Sagan's fault.
That's Van Avermaet's problem then. If you choose to ride directly behind a rider who is taking a risk by riding close to the barriers you willingly take that same risk. There would have been no risk if he had been in front of Sagan, if he wasn't able to do that, that too is his problem.

Riding in the peloton is also a risk. That's bike racing. Can't ride 50m behind the peloton all day and expect to win. Doesn't mean you're at fault when someone in front of you makes a judgemental error.
No, but you could surely ride on the right side on the Kwaremont and expect to win.

Agreed, if you think a rider is dangerous, either back off or ride somewhere else. GvA's trust in following Sagan on that side was also his undoing. And given Sagan's bike handling reputation, who wouldn't follow him?