rhubroma said:
Keram said:
I dont know if they would catch him but I am really pi***d we would never know. The fact is the half minute before the crash Sagan started pulling really strong and start droping people from his wheel. I am not even sure Nasen would hold at the top of Kwaremont with Sagan and GVA. GVA lost 10-12 second because of crash itself a lot of seconds because he has lower speed up the Kwaremont since then. Van Baarle was 5-6 seconds ahead of GVA at the top of Paterberg. He lost wheels before that crash already. He would be ton of seconds behind GVA and Sagan would they speed up Kwaremont like they did before the crash, sharing pulls before Paterberg and flyied up the Paterberg. I think GVA (with Sagan) would be there at least 20-25 seconds earlier than GVA was there. I cant say if they would catch him but they were fully commited to that short before that crash. Anyway. Great deserved winner and great Ronde. But without crash would be finale hell of a more dramatic.
These were my sentiments. Crashes are part of bike racing. Still it is always unfortunate for the drama of the race, when favorites go down (and for such a wacky reason) at perhaps the defining moment. Since one likes to see the real undertakings, whether successfull or not, but never see them extinguished because of a fall.
Agreed, the drama was lost at the moment of the crash; and I'm convinced he would have been caught.
The race was poised for a fabulous final act, a work of tragic theatre; Gilbert the plucky, idealistic hero awaiting his dramatic metaphorical death in all it's brutal glory. What we got instead was like a schmaltzy Americanised romantic slapstick rewrite replete with sunsets and high-fives. I want my money back.
I feel bad for Boonen. His final time riding this race and his team make a complete shambles of the mechanical help needed. Very dignified the way he handled it I thought.