2017 Volta Ciclista a Catalunya, March 20-26, WT

Page 12 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Feb 17, 2017
452
0
0
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
deValtos said:
Hey be positive guys. This could mean a lot of attacks from a lot of teams in the later stages.
There are no stages that present a reasonable opportunity to attack from far. The climbs (except for Lo Port) are either very easy or too far from the finish. That's the big issue with this parcours - together with this ridiculous TTT, of course.

Anyway, there is no way Valverde doesn't win. He'll grab like 20 bonus seconds as well.

Stage 6!
 
Re: Re:

portugal11 said:
LaFlorecita said:
Hahahahahaha Movistar beating BMC. Contador will be at least 1'30" behind Valverde. No point watching this ridiculous race anymore. The organizers are **** stupid.
This route was clearly made for valverde. This is just ridiculous... they make routes for uphill sprinters and not for pure attackers. Bring pais vasco, that's a proper race!!!
The Basques know how to create a balanced parcours at least :)
 
Jun 30, 2014
7,060
2
0
Re: Re:

RattaKuningas said:
Lexman said:
what's the use of Rojas, always last rider not taking any turn not letting it go either??

Maybe they are saving him for later.
Maybe they want to let him wear the leaders jersey, the Catalans would surely love it...
 
Re: Re:

portugal11 said:
LaFlorecita said:
Hahahahahaha Movistar beating BMC. Contador will be at least 1'30" behind Valverde. No point watching this ridiculous race anymore. The organizers are **** stupid.
This route was clearly made for valverde. This is just ridiculous... they make routes for uphill sprinters and not for pure attackers. Bring pais vasco, that's a proper race!!!
Cheer for the borgs in such a case. My sincere lol @ valverdes win being a horrible thing
 
Feb 17, 2017
452
0
0
Re: Re:

dacooley said:
portugal11 said:
LaFlorecita said:
Hahahahahaha Movistar beating BMC. Contador will be at least 1'30" behind Valverde. No point watching this ridiculous race anymore. The organizers are **** stupid.
This route was clearly made for valverde. This is just ridiculous... they make routes for uphill sprinters and not for pure attackers. Bring pais vasco, that's a proper race!!!
Cheer for the borgs in such a case. My sincere lol @ valverdes win being a horrible thing

Yeah he will win well getting smoked on Lo Port
 
Re: Re:

Climber123 said:
LaFlorecita said:
deValtos said:
Hey be positive guys. This could mean a lot of attacks from a lot of teams in the later stages.
There are no stages that present a reasonable opportunity to attack from far. The climbs (except for Lo Port) are either very easy or too far from the finish. That's the big issue with this parcours - together with this ridiculous TTT, of course.

Anyway, there is no way Valverde doesn't win. He'll grab like 20 bonus seconds as well.

Stage 6!
Yeah what? There are 40kms from the summit to the finish and the climb is like 6% average.
 
Feb 17, 2017
452
0
0
Re: Re:

LaFlorecita said:
Climber123 said:
LaFlorecita said:
deValtos said:
Hey be positive guys. This could mean a lot of attacks from a lot of teams in the later stages.
There are no stages that present a reasonable opportunity to attack from far. The climbs (except for Lo Port) are either very easy or too far from the finish. That's the big issue with this parcours - together with this ridiculous TTT, of course.

Anyway, there is no way Valverde doesn't win. He'll grab like 20 bonus seconds as well.

Stage 6!
Yeah what? There are 40kms from the summit to the finish and the climb is like 6% average.

Long range, there are 50kms of climbing before-hand with little opportunity for domestiques to return to the fray if you drop them. You just need to have a decent gap on the start of the decent (20k to go) with no support for the GC leaders behind. Its worth a try.
 
Feb 21, 2017
1,019
0
0
Re: Re:

Cance > TheRest said:
GraftPunk said:
Orica with a middlin' finish at 50:19
Weren't they 1.10 down at the intermediate? In that case, they almost matched BMC on the last part.

I guess they do tend to favor negative splits, maybe they were just too conservative in the beginning.