Tom Leezer hates thisMess up and Greg will sprint for ninth place.
The Cycling News forum is looking to add some volunteer moderators with Red Rick's recent retirement. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Tom Leezer hates thisMess up and Greg will sprint for ninth place.
The only two who have enjoyed some victories an one day racing are Chaves and Uran. From the 2 I would pick Uran to have a better result. However Chaves performance was getting a bit better at the end of the Tour.What do you think about the Colombians here? Cannot really make up my mind about them.
Belgium will do all the work and then lose like always.Okay I really wonder what Belgium is gonna do.
Van Aerts biggest worry might be getting Devoldered.
I’ve just noticed that Dan Martin isn’t riding. A couple of years ago he’d have been considered a favourite on a course like this. So Ireland qualified six but only three are riding, one of whom is an espoir and another an 80kg TTist. Cycling Ireland didn’t send a team at all to the women’s events.
The explanation for the absence of a women’s team is a self serving nonsense in the absence of the best women riders announcing that they don’t want to ride. And there was no such announcement or indication. Every rider on just about every team has other targets sooner than November. I’m even more annoyed after the explanation than I was before.To be fair to them, they clarified their reasons for it; put simply, their road women cyclists are u23s, so there’s no Worlds for them this year, and their priority for their elite women cyclists is the track in November.
It’s a shame Martin isn’t riding this course, but he can’t be fully fit right now, even if he did have good enough form to contest. Our lads have just never done well at the Worlds since 87, really. (Except Mark Scanlon’s junior title).
The explanation for the absence of a women’s team is a self serving nonsense in the absence of the best women riders announcing that they don’t want to ride. And there was no such announcement or indication. Every rider on just about every team has other targets sooner than November. I’m even more annoyed after the explanation than I was before.
As for the men, well Martin is the only potentially relevant rider and if he isn’t in shape and doesn’t want to do it, they may as well let Roche do whatever he wants and send a kid for experience because why not. Mullen can get a few bottles and then go for a relaxing coffee somewhere,
Maybe in recent times but Roche in 87 and Merckx in 70or 71 I would take over WVA in2020Has anyone ever had a run of results anything like WVA this year? Two big classics wins, followed by two tour stage sprint wins alongside some incredible super dom climbing and 2nd in hilly tt and then 2nd in WC tt?
In the age of specialisation, there has been nothing remotely like it. Even outside of this age, it is historically amazing.
Dunne got in the break in Richmond. Martin got in the break in Yorkshire, but would surely have been better used guiding Bennett through the first few hours of racing and keeping him fresh for the final laps.What annoys me outside of the riders we dont send the ones we do send dont seem to have any sort of plan. I know we rarely have a favourite but we could at least pretend that we are there to win. How many WC and Olympics have we seen where Irish riders just sit in the bunch and roll in at 35th place and I bet thats what will happen tomorrow. At least get in a break and die with your boots on
Dunne got in the break in Richmond. Martin got in the break in Yorkshire, but would surely have been better used guiding Bennett through the first few hours of racing and keeping him fresh for the final laps.
I can’t see any way the 3 guys in Imola come away with anything, but you’re right, if they at least rode like there’s some sort of grand strategy at play it wouldn’t feel so bad to read the following day that they dnf’d with 60km to go.
As a Dane, I think that will be a problem for Fuglsang. The team is pretty weak this year. Some of the best rides have focused on the classics to come and go for good results in these races.And riders like Woods and Fuglsang, do they have a national team strong enough to help when it hurts?
How are most of them going to react with only one weeks rest since the tour? What about the lenght of the course - is'nt it longer than every tour stage this year?Hm, mine, now:
**** * van Aert
**** Pogacar
*** Fuglsang
** Woods, Valverde
* Kwiatkowski, Alaphilippe, Schachmann, Hirschi, an Italian
and I know now I should never write off Richie Porte!
I think it's pretty idiotic to 'focus on the classics' while the parcours at these worlds is a classics one. It's definitely a missed opportunity for Kragh, for instance. He could've done very well here if the race remained closed for long enough. Besides, look at Belgium: all their riders are classics riders - so are they now going to go badly in Flanders etc. because of this one extra race (perhaps the most important in the year)?As a Dane, I think that will be a problem for Fuglsang. The team is pretty weak this year. Some of the best rides have focused on the classics to come and go for good results in these races.
I think, now that you mention it, both Dunne (all 6’10” of him) and Mullen (all 80kgs of him) got in the break in Innsbruck. And that’s fine, but like Martin going up the road in Yorkshire, it betrays a lack of confidence in the ability on the course; Martin hadn’t a chance in Innsbruck really, having just had twins, but if the team had been focused from the start on delivering him to the last lap as fresh and protected as possible, he might’ve at least had a sniff of top 10 or something.Didn't you get one in the early break in Innsburck as well?
I agree.... but if the tactics is all in for Fuglsang (it is now), then I can understand Kragh. He will focus on keeping his employer happy and go for his own chances in the classics, which might suit him better than this course.I think it's pretty idiotic to 'focus on the classics' while the parcours at these worlds is a classics one. It's definitely a missed opportunity for Kragh, for instance. He could've done very well here if the race remained closed for long enough. Besides, look at Belgium: all their riders are classics riders - so are they now going to go badly in Flanders etc. because of this one extra race (perhaps the most important in the year)?
The only two who have enjoyed some victories an one day racing are Chaves and Uran. From the 2 I would pick Uran to have a better result. However Chaves performance was getting a bit better at the end of the Tour.
I would not discount Dani Martinez. He is sitting on good form. Not the Sergios. Higuita has been having issues with his performance.
Now if you were asking about their chances overall, I don't see them with too much chance. They are underdogs which is the only thing that will play in their favor. They can fly under the radar. Especially Zubeldia.
Speaking of Belgium, Lefevre is really petty. Not sending Devenyns to the WC because Remco isn't riding and not wanting an non- Quickstep Belgium to have a better chance...I think it's pretty idiotic to 'focus on the classics' while the parcours at these worlds is a classics one. It's definitely a missed opportunity for Kragh, for instance. He could've done very well here if the race remained closed for long enough. Besides, look at Belgium: all their riders are classics riders - so are they now going to go badly in Flanders etc. because of this one extra race (perhaps the most important in the year)?
I think it's pretty idiotic to 'focus on the classics' while the parcours at these worlds is a classics one.