Hopefully Vlasov, Carthy, Bardet or Almeida try something from really far out to try to get on the podium, but I'm not very hopeful on that.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
Youre a bit too pessimistic now. If all the climbs had 1% more it would be a really great stage. I fear its a tad too easy, but this is stage 20, 3 climbs and relatively high altitude. Sure the racing situation can make it so it will be a passive stage. I dont really have any problem with it, although I admit it feels flat after the queen stage getting shortened. Could be a lot worse..The only positives I see is the technicality of the descents?
1% is generally 10-15% more altitude gain over the same distance, very significant. If San Bernadino was false flat first then got really hard like Manghen or Agnello i'd be more optimistic but it has no single stretch really hard enough the last part being under 7% makes it near impossible. Also doesn't help Spluga isn't particularly steep + has an easier section in the middle.Youre a bit too pessimistic now. If all the climbs had 1% more it would be a really great stage. I fear its a tad too easy, but this is stage 20, 3 climbs and relatively high altitude. Sure the racing situation can make it so it will be a passive stage. I dont really have any problem with it, although I admit it feels flat after the queen stage getting shortened. Could be a lot worse..
At this time of the race, even those gradients at altitude can do a lot of damage. Remember that there are a lot of tired legs now. I remember Sestriere last year that had shallow gradients. That was enough to split the peloton to pieces.
Team Ineos had to attack then.At this time of the race, even those gradients at altitude can do a lot of damage. Remember that there are a lot of tired legs now. I remember Sestriere last year that had shallow gradients. That was enough to split the peloton to pieces.
Now we enter the world of the what ifs. If I were to guess before the race I would have put the money on rain and cold rather than sun. So we are asking for too much. If anything Bernal would have put more time into Yates on stage 16 if it wasn't for the curtailment.If even one of the wet mountain stages had been dry, we would be looking at a climax to this Giro for the ages. As it is, Yates is clearly the strongest at this point but there doesn’t seem to be the kind of opportunities he would need to really challenge Bernal’s lead.
This. If the 2 removed passes had stayed in, Yates gets dropped earlier and loses buckets of time.Now we enter the world of the what ifs. If I were to guess before the race I would have put the money on rain and cold rather than sun. So we are asking for too much. If anything Bernal would have put more time into Yates on stage 16 if it wasn't for the curtailment.
I still think the gradients and effort are more than enough to shatter things if a team really wants. Lots of fatigue and effort in the legs tomorrow.
Best hope of an all out assault on Bernal is probably an alliance though, otherwise I think it will be a podium fight.
I like the stage design actually, and I even like it as the final stage of GC action in mountains. But given the underwhelming and comparatively easy Giro we've had so far, it doesn't quite do enough. Hopefully we'll see some great action in what has been a pretty tame Giro otherwise.
I agree, if it wasn't for the tappone being turned into a tappino I'd be totally fine wih this one.Youre a bit too pessimistic now. If all the climbs had 1% more it would be a really great stage. I fear its a tad too easy, but this is stage 20, 3 climbs and relatively high altitude. Sure the racing situation can make it so it will be a passive stage. I dont really have any problem with it, although I admit it feels flat after the queen stage getting shortened. Could be a lot worse..
Yeah I think people are being too pessimistic as well. A lot of people remember the outcome of stages and then in hindsight it seems like it was all written in stone but that's very rare in cycling. Today was a lot of fun for me. Similarly, I remember stage 20 in the 2017 Giro on a far less promising profile where Quintana and Nibali kept attacking Dumoulin and I really believe had Bob Jungels not been fighting for GC the end of that story would have been completely different.At this time of the race, even those gradients at altitude can do a lot of damage. Remember that there are a lot of tired legs now. I remember Sestriere last year that had shallow gradients. That was enough to split the peloton to pieces.
The high valleys mean the whole final 80km of the stage is above 1000m, and most of that time will be spent going up gradients above 7%. This will not be an easy stage.all these peaks would look amazing if not for those....high valleys.
I liked that profile. The 20km of rolling terrain directly after the summit meant there was likely going to be actual bike racing, where guys pedal their bikes really fast along the roads, and so it proved. I'd like to see something like that more often, where there's a bit of breathing space for the race after the last obstacle, rather than the line being right at the top or toe of the mountain.Yeah I think people are being to pessimistic as well. A lot of people remember the outcome of stages and then in hindsight it seems like it was all written in stone but that's very rare in cycling. Today was a lot of fun for me. Similarly, I remember stage 20 in the 2017 Giro on a far less promising profile where Quintana and Nibali kept attacking Dumoulin and I really believe had Bob Jungels not been fighting for GC the end of that story would have been completely different.
But yeah, in terms of epic attacks unless Yates really pays for the last few days or Bernal cracks early I see some huge fireworks being set off early. Haven't been this excited for a stage since the 2015 Tour.