The biggest mistake was Remco going from 180 km. Such a waste.And even if Van Aert had been at his very best, it was never a good idea to have the rider with the biggest target on his back in such a vulnerable position when Remco was done.
The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to
In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.
Thanks!
The biggest mistake was Remco going from 180 km. Such a waste.And even if Van Aert had been at his very best, it was never a good idea to have the rider with the biggest target on his back in such a vulnerable position when Remco was done.
Left it too lateThe biggest mistake was Remco going from 180 km. Such a waste.
Yeah, he was decent in the Vuelta last year and ok this year but nothing like 2018 or lately. Anyway, he's fun to watch when he's going well.Valgren hit a really good form at the 2020 Vuelta and has been pretty good since. He has been unlucky with crashes but his form has been good all year.
Agreed, my point is that he actually had the best legs for Belgium today...I think Alaphillippe was the class of the field, regardless.Maybe, maybe not. Riding on the front at a hard steady tempo isn't the same as the kind of explosion in the legs Ala has. I don't think he would have been able to go with him. Maybe once or twice but I don't think anyone had the form today to go with him on that last one. But yeah, if somehow he'd been able to go with him every time at least Belgium would have come away with a silver.
With a winner not nearly as cool as the former, nor as much of an underdog story as the later.This is the Worlds RR equivalent of 2015 Gent-Wevelgem or 2016 Paris-Roubaix.
Alaphilippe benefitted so much from the fact that this was raced hard from that far. All of the attacks of Remcos, Asgreens etc (of course French as well) paved a path for the French success, making the field exhausted as far as they hit the final Leuven laps.
Thanks to that, those short climbs turned out to be long and steep enough for his trademark moves.
He outsprinted him in an uphill finish in Tour of Britain stage 4 just a few weeks ago..Van Aert has never been in Alaf's explosiveness class. Not even at his best form.
I think his uphill explosivity falls off a lot in super hard races with a lot of repetitions tbh.He outsprinted him in an uphill finish in Tour of Britain stage 4 just a few weeks ago..
All of the attacks of Remcos, Asgreens etc
Mind the repetitiveness aspect of Alaf's explosivity as well.He outsprinted him in an uphill finish in Tour of Britain stage 4 just a few weeks ago..
# | Rider | Today | Y'day | Up/down |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ALAPHILIPPE Julian | 6328 | 1221 | ▲5107 |
2 | VALGREN Michael | 4730 | 928 | ▲3802 |
3 | BALSAMO Elisa | 4453 | 14663 | ▼10210 |
4 | SAINBAYAR Jambaljamts | 3861 | 294 | ▲3567 |
5 | VAN BAARLE Dylan | 3574 | 408 | ▲3166 |
6 | HOELGAARD Markus | 3547 | 512 | ▲3035 |
7 | VAN AERT Wout | 2321 | 1659 | ▲662 |
8 | POWLESS Neilson | 2297 | 360 | ▲1937 |
9 | STUYVEN Jasper | 1961 | 633 | ▲1328 |
10 | COLBRELLI Sonny | 1959 | 1128 | ▲831 |
Worst possible winner for this race again. On the other hand, 2021 has shown he's started his decline and he's not going to do much again without help.
Lol, always thought van Baarle was olderRandom fact of the day: The first four riders were all born in 1992.
Lol, always thought van Baarle is older
He didn't look completely wasted to me.If you have one of the strongest riders, and completely waste him with 200km to go, i think it's fair to say tactics sucked huge balls.
At the very least he wasted his chances.He didn't look completely wasted to me.