He's just a bottle half empty kind of person, unlike his fans.Landa not entertained, his bottle is empty.
Thats disgusting. Shameful from this great riderMVDP got his pineapple pizza in the end
![]()
What is the lowest you have graded a GT and which one was it (roughly)? I wonder if you actually use a scale that goes from 1 to 10.5/10
I think a lot of the breakaways and fight for the win on a daily basis, was entertaining on many of the stages.
It was great to see some older riders having a great race and many young riders breaking through.
I think there were a few unfortunate events that affected the race. Riders dropping out because of sickness or mishaps. Those are circumstances nobody can control and made the GC action a bit hesitant most times. Nobody out of the top 3 had to make up much time on the others, and there was less chance of anyone taking any big risks with them being the three strongest riders left in the race.
Was it the best race? No. Was it a completely boring race? No.
Hence the average rating, for me.
You can figure it out.What is the lowest you have graded a GT and which one was it (roughly)? I wonder if you actually use a scale that goes from 1 to 10.
Thought you were smarter than that. It wouldnt be an "average rating" by that scale, as I said.So on a scale from 5 to 10, this Giro was a 5?
I don't really understand why people are saying this. The numbers in this race from Hindley, Carapaz and Landa were high. I feel that a lot of people are annoyed they were wrong about Hindley and are now trying to claim this was another fake Giro when in reality both Hindley and TGH were worthy winners.Carapaz was/is a shadow of himself.
So it's from 5 to 5? Or you have actually graded other GTs lower? When?Thought you were smarter than that. It wouldnt be an "average rating" by that scale, as I said.
The scale is 1 to 10 and I graded it 5 out of 10, if it is so hard for you to understand.So it's from 5 to 5? Or you have actually graded other GTs lower? When?