• The Cycling News forum is still looking to add volunteer moderators with. If you're interested in helping keep our discussions on track, send a direct message to @SHaines here on the forum, or use the Contact Us form to message the Community Team.

    In the meanwhile, please use the Report option if you see a post that doesn't fit within the forum rules.

    Thanks!

2023 World Championships team selections

Page 11 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
What are you talking about?
Im talking about the fact that riding your mountain bike generates infinitely less interest and therefore is a lot less prestigious than the road race. That's the big prize, everybody knows that.

Of course, there's your cycling addicts that will basically watch anything cycling-related, and then there's your mountain bike enjoyers, but generally speaking that segment is extremely small compared to people who watch the road racing. That's just how it is, and therefore there are obviously people on this forum who think its weird that he'd prioritize like he does.

Of course, Im not too fond of anything else than male road racing, so Im biased, but literally everyone I know IRL (who watches cycling) has absolutely no clue about anything else other than road racing and the occasional Van der Poel-Van Aert rivalry in the winther if you randomnly find such a race on your screen.

Yes, I don't understand it at all.
 
Wait, you actually think a MTB world title and a road world title are equally prestigious?
I never said that. What I am saying is that terms like interesting, prestigious and every other comparable word in the book has no factual description, and the only one to give meaning to such terms is the person itself, i.e. Pidcock. If he finds it to be that way, it is not strange.
 
All I see are subjective thoughts, including yours.
MTB, like CX, is a tiny sport compared to road racing so in that sense it is objectively less important.

He doesn't have anything left to prove in that discipline either so it is kind of a weird decision to skip the road race. Him winning the MTB title is rather meaningless compared to a win on the road. "In the land of the blind" and all that.

He might think he has almost no chance of beating MVDP/WVA/Evenepoel, in that respect I understand going for a safe bet at MTB. Pretty lame decision as far as I'm concerned but ok.
 
I never said that. What I am saying is that terms like interesting, prestigious and every other comparable word in the book has no factual description, and the only one to give meaning to such terms is the person itself, i.e. Pidcock. If he finds it to be that way, it is not strange.
So there is no objective difference between a world title in football and a world title in, say, korfball?
 
MTB, like CX, is a tiny sport compared to road racing so in that sense it is objectively less important.
To you. 'Important' has various meanings and descriptions.

He doesn't have anything left to prove in that discipline either so it is kind of a weird decision to skip the road race. Him winning the MTB title is rather meaningless compared to a win on the road. "In the land of the blind" and all that.
He is yet to be a world champion in XCO, so he has plenty to prove and to gain.

He might think he has almost no chance of beating MVDP/WVA/Evenepoel, in that respect I understand going for a safe bet at MTB. Pretty lame decision as far as I'm concerned but ok.
He is going up against the greatest to ever do it, Nino Schurter. Furthermore, Van der Poel will be there as well.
 
Last edited:
All I see are subjective thoughts, including yours.
Pidcock has openly stated his desire to win all 3 of his preferred discipline's world titles and the MTB course in Glasgow suits him very well. I'd say he has a much, much better chance at ticking off the MTB rainbows this year than he does on the road. After the Olympics next year he may give up on the MTB racing and will have many years of chasing road rainbows ahead of him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StryderHells