3rd June: Criterium du Dauphiné stage 1, 5.7km

Page 24 - Get up to date with the latest news, scores & standings from the Cycling News Community.
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
cycladianpirate said:
You bet heavily on cycling? The overround (ironically also known as the "juice") is horrendous - bad, bad sport to pick.

cycling is best way to make a living. odds are way bigger and I know the most about it
 
Oct 23, 2009
5,772
0
17,480
Dekker_Tifosi said:
actually no, barredo and martin started in the same time period. So for that is no excuse :)
Actually no, Tony Martin rode in the rain whereas it was dry when Barredo started. Also, there were 45 minutes between them, so the wind could have changed a little by then too.
 
Dec 30, 2011
3,547
0
0
maltiv said:
Actually no, Tony Martin rode in the rain whereas it was dry when Barredo started. Also, there were 45 minutes between them, so the wind could have changed a little by then too.

The wind did change in between their rides.
But Martin was rumoured to have ridden in the rain but in the highlights there was certainly no rain in sight when Martin was riding, so I doubt it.
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
maltiv said:
Actually no, Tony Martin rode in the rain whereas it was dry when Barredo started. Also, there were 45 minutes between them, so the wind could have changed a little by then too.

There was no rain. Tony Martin rode in the dry, he even said so himself. *yawn*
Stop defending him, he was simply worse. Tony Martin is no prologue specialist. He can only win one of it's suited to him (long straights etc), but that's not the case here.
 
Dekker_Tifosi said:
There was no rain. Tony Martin rode in the dry, he even said so himself. *yawn*
Stop defending him, he was simply worse. Tony Martin is no prologue specialist. He can only win one of it's suited to him (long straights etc), but that's not the case here.

It's that "yawn" something new you are beginning to say to everyone that says anything differently than you?
 
Mar 27, 2011
6,135
7
17,495
Congrats too Durbridge, it's an outstanding result.

Wiggins also went well and Grivko, Gerrans and Maertens did too.
 
Mar 13, 2009
29,413
3,482
28,180
DominicDecoco said:
It's that "yawn" something new you are beginning to say to everyone that says anything differently than you?

I've only used it once after 5 other people used it against me?? :rolleyes: I didn't even start it so bugg.er off
 
Feb 20, 2010
33,064
15,272
28,180
El Pistolero said:
His half Russian side made him do a good time trial :p

Amador is really one of those few interesting South-American cyclists in my opinion together with Betancourt.
Amador isn't South American.
Dekker_Tifosi said:
Quintana won the Tour of Murcia against Tiernan-Locke in form and was 2nd in Volta a Madrid just a month ago. He's been hugely impressive to me
It's too bad Movistar cancelled him out of the Giro for Intxausti :(
To be fair, it wasn't exactly a bad call. Intxausti was in the top 10 until three days to go. He had a fever mid-race, but kept going because of his good GC position, thought he was over it but just didn't have any power in the legs on the Manghen.

It would have been Quintana's first GT, so lord knows if he would have had the recovery to have done any better than Intxausti did.
 
Mar 31, 2010
18,136
6
0
Libertine Seguros said:
Amador isn't South American.

To be fair, it wasn't exactly a bad call. Intxausti was in the top 10 until three days to go. He had a fever mid-race, but kept going because of his good GC position, thought he was over it but just didn't have any power in the legs on the Manghen.

It would have been Quintana's first GT, so lord knows if he would have had the recovery to have done any better than Intxausti did.

what does intxausti have to do with it? he didn't replace quintana and movistar sucked in gc.

amador is latin-american
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,894
2,254
25,680
It would be good if they take Quintana to the Vuelta, with all those MTFs, but only if Valverde fails.
 

rzombie1988

BANNED
Jul 19, 2009
402
8
9,295
I would have liked to have seen this today but yeah, steephll failed me.

I know Andy only lost about 30 seconds on 5km, but if you multiply that by 20you get the number of TT KM's in the tour and he'd lose over 10 minutes. Sure, he didn't go full stength on this and I'm sure he's going to be better come July, but all the attacks in the mountains aren't going to make that time up. I think he may be in trouble. I think even making up half that time at 5 minutes is going to be rough. That's also assuming he only loses time on TT's and not on other stages or due to any crashes.
 
Mar 17, 2012
1,069
0
0
Andy Schleck is 26 or 27, has won LBL in 2009 and the Tour in 2010, as was confirmed this week by giving him the yellow jersey officially. He might have earned good money from 2005.

He has reached everything he wanted to reach, and the maximum he can reach, a Giro/Vuelta/Amstel/Worlds/... win wouldn´t change that too much.

Now everything is just for fun for him, as he showed again in this prologue. What did Riis say about Ullrich in April 2006? "Ullrich seems to be unhappy to still be a pro rider", or s.th. like that. It´s the same for Andy now.

He is so gifted by nature, so he doesn´t have to adapt to the cold, the wet, the descents, the attacks, the time trials.

I guess he´ll do a few more years for pleasure and retire then.

Probably he hasn´t improved his time trial a lot in 2012, again... Van den Broeck, for example, has, and so did others, and Andy could have managed that, with Bruyneel and all these guys behind him. Just see how Rasmussen improved his time trial from 2005 to 2007. I guess Andy just didn´t have the motivation, the will to improve this.
 
Aug 18, 2009
4,993
1
0
Froome19 said:
Its called the Wind

Not just surprised that someone beat Tony, but that Barredo was in the top 5. I really really hadn't thought he was a prologue specialist.
 
Jun 10, 2010
19,894
2,254
25,680
Jun 21, 2011
322
0
0
RHRH19861986 said:
Andy Schleck is 26 or 27, has won LBL in 2009 and the Tour in 2010, as was confirmed this week by giving him the yellow jersey officially. He might have earned good money from 2005.

He has reached everything he wanted to reach, and the maximum he can reach, a Giro/Vuelta/Amstel/Worlds/... win wouldn´t change that too much.

Now everything is just for fun for him, as he showed again in this prologue. What did Riis say about Ullrich in April 2006? "Ullrich seems to be unhappy to still be a pro rider", or s.th. like that. It´s the same for Andy now.

He is so gifted by nature, so he doesn´t have to adapt to the cold, the wet, the descents, the attacks, the time trials.

I guess he´ll do a few more years for pleasure and retire then.

Probably he hasn´t improved his time trial a lot in 2012, again... Van den Broeck, for example, has, and so did others, and Andy could have managed that, with Bruyneel and all these guys behind him. Just see how Rasmussen improved his time trial from 2005 to 2007. I guess Andy just didn´t have the motivation, the will to improve this.

The record books say Andy has won a tour but he hasn't experienced winning the tour. He hasn't cycled onto the Champs-Elysees in yellow, sipped the champagne and stood on the top step of the podium. Until he does his career won't be complete.
 
Sep 9, 2011
164
0
0
Ragerod said:
The record books say Andy has won a tour but he hasn't experienced winning the tour. He hasn't cycled onto the Champs-Elysees in yellow, sipped the champagne and stood on the top step of the podium. Until he does his career won't be complete.

This is probably the most problematic theme regarding doping in cycle racing, and there is no solution to it. It`s about timing and feelings. Being a winner only in the aftermath is a harsh thing, But he is the winner.
 
Jul 16, 2010
17,455
5
0
The opinion of a rider matters in this case. Andy said he wants to win it on the road and not in court. Most problematic theme regarding doping in cycle racing solved.