Sorry, but I'm of the opinion that there is still a lot of riders doping. Just doping less than a few years ago. Some guys are clean, yes. But a big problem is all the false negatives in testing. As long as riders can microdose or mask, if there is any benefit to doping, and they get easy access and assistance to doping products, and
there's a reasonable chance they won't get caught, they'll continue to dope. Rebellin and Schumacher (assuming it's him) were just foolish enough to use Cera.
Schumacher, if he's really the other rider, must have an IQ ten points lower than Richard Vireuque. Unbelievable.
Don't think cycling is the only sport with the problem for one second. Everyone wanted to tar and feather Jose Canseco when
Juiced! came out claiming that steroid and HGH use was rampant in baseball; called him a liar, fabricator, and everything else. And yet, pretty much everything he said has come true. Baseball's as dirty as cycling. So are most other sports. Mr. Tibbs is right, we at least try to catch our guys.
Kjetilraknerud - Your English is fine and your thoughts are welcome. Keep on posting.
Ingsve's comments on XC skiing ring very true in retrospect. If you want a real look at XC skiing's issue, go back to the 2002 Olympics where winner Johann Mühlegg was doped on EPO, and Per Elofsson, who was completely anti-doping, the Giles Delion of his sport, was not, but finished 5th. After the positive test, it made sense that Per raced as well as he did, and it only made sense that Mühlegg - who should have finished about 20th, performed the way he did.