- Nov 16, 2013
- 26,686
- 27,791
- 28,180
You must mean Richard Antonio Carapaz Montenegro, Olympic champion, the designated Ineos leader, climber of hills, breaker of hearts, first of his name.
Fancy way of writing "no, not yet".
You must mean Richard Antonio Carapaz Montenegro, Olympic champion, the designated Ineos leader, climber of hills, breaker of hearts, first of his name.
I hope for Bernal that this is not the plan because Carapaz has serious voodoo when it comes to multi leader tacticsDoes anyone know more about what Ineos plans to do here, except throw in 2/3 of their best riders and let them fight out who's in which position in the train?
I thought they said Yates is the leader, but does that still stand? Did he crash in Burgos? Did the others hurt themselves? What about Pidcock's role, experience, free radicale, part of the train, train-training or possibility to go for GC...?
Ineos squad:
Bernal, Carapaz, Yates, Pidcock,Sivakov, van Baarle, Puccio, Narvaez
So no Martinez.. perhaps the Burgos crash had something to do with it..
Strongest Vuelta team since Astana 2015.Bahrain: Yukiya Arashiro, Damiano Caruso, Jan Tratnik, Jack Haig, Mikel Landa, Gino Mäder, Mark Padun, Wout Poels.
That is ridiculously strong as well.
Interesting take.Strongest Vuelta team since Astana 2015.
Concerning the route, on second view it's still alright but not great. It's funny how the vuelta has kept this reputation of being super hard and climbing heavy from when it actually was for a couple of years, despite the routes having regressed to a completely normal number of flat stages.
I tried to teach /r/peloton the ways of route criticism but they won't have it.Looking forward to it. I can kinda see why Roglic is the favorite but I'm surprised by the margin of the poll. I barely followed cycling since the Tour but is there a reason people don't have trust in Bernal? He has his flaws but so does Roglic and Roglic's preparation was far from perfect (even though he was superb in Tokyo)
Concerning the route, on second view it's still alright but not great. It's funny how the vuelta has kept this reputation of being super hard and climbing heavy from when it actually was for a couple of years, despite the routes having regressed to a completely normal number of flat stages. Read the vuelta route thread on Reddit if you want a good laugh at people circlejerking about the "insane difficulty" of an incredibly ordinary GT route.
That being said, I like how many medium mountain stages this edition has. Just wish they had come at the expense of flat stages.
Before or after Nibali was booted from La Vuelta.Yes, it's somewhat wishful thinking, but I think Bahrain is more likely to reach Astana 2015-level strength than Ineos.
Didn't Sean Kelly win this once. It was very flat at times in the past especially when Indurain was aboutEver since ASO took over it has become more sprinter friendly like the Tour.
ASO = All Sprinters Aboard
Indurain never won the Vuelta. Its flattest time was in the 60s when they were deliberately tailoring it to the overseas stars they were trying to bring in, and the skiing industry hadn't taken off meaning places like Escudo then a run-in to Reinosa, Urkiola then a run-in to Vitória-Gasteiz or Pajáres then a run-in to León were the most likely mountain stages, and Mirador del Fito then a descent to Cangas de Onis was one of the toughest stages around. From the early 70s, El Correo-El Pueblo Vasco started to try to add in as many mountains as they could, but even then MTF options were limited, so you had Formigal, Arrate, Naranco and Peña Cabarga as the kind of summits we saw, it was only really in the 80s when Unipublic took over and the finishes in the Basque region came to an end that they started looking elsewhere for climbs, as the organisers being based out of the Basque region and using the Basque climbs as the key-note climactic stages meant there wasn't too much investigating elsewhere, plus the relative lack of development in the infrastructure of Franco's Spain meant that a lot of the early part of the race was more about them being paid to run along the coast and show off the infrastructure and the tourist towns than them trying to make a decisive bike race. The 80s saw places like Lagos de Covadonga and Sierra Nevada which have become staples added to the race's repertoire and Pajáres turned into a regular MTF rather than a mid-stage climb as well as dialling up the difficulty of the Sierra de Gredos stages, before the likes of the Andorra ski stations, Cerler, Cruz de la Demanda, Valdezcaray, Pla de Beret and Navacerrada became heartlands of the race in the 90s.Didn't Sean Kelly win this once. It was very flat at times in the past especially when Indurain was about
Yeah those one and a half off days he had in the Giro were super weird but since he didn't end up completely cracking I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that this was a one off. It's not like he just cannot have a good shape over three weeks since he was back to being the strongest climber on stage 20. It might have been a sign that he tends to have off days though.I tried to teach /r/peloton the ways of route criticism but they won't have it.
Anyway, I just struggle to see where Bernal is actually better than Roglic, apart from his team on a route where it's hard to leverage a strong team.
I also think Bernals rep wasn't helped by his 3rd Giro week and the Giro opposition.
Basically I'm assuming Roglic comes in fresh and in great form because he's barely raced in the last few months but dropped a monster Olympic ITT. I don't see how he struggles with fatigue as in the Vuelta last year.Yeah those one and a half off days he had in the Giro were super weird but since he didn't end up completely cracking I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt that this was a one off. It's not like he just cannot have a good shape over three weeks since he was back to being the strongest climber on stage 20. It might have been a sign that he tends to have off days though.
About Roglic, I don't know, it's not a secret that I'm not as convinced of him as a gc rider as most are. Moreover peaking for the Tour and crashing out cannot have been a perfect preparation for this race and last year Carapaz almost beat a not perfectly prepared Roglic.
Also, while the route clearly suits Roglic better than Bernal, the third week, where Roglic has had his problems in the past, looks really good for Bernal with the two hardest mtf's, one of which is an absolute monster, a really tough medium mountain stage where team strength might be vital and a very late TT which has been pretty bad for Roglic twice in the past.
Finally as race that is more about the GC riders than the sprinters.
And 6 times that meaning is sprint stageExactly, every stage has a meaning.
I think it's just that the Tour-Vuelta GC combo with the Olympics road race on another continent in between would be just too much for a 22 years old who has been in form all year since February. You don't want to overrace a rider who still has 6 years of a multimillion contract left!The absence of Pogačar tells me they're uncertain he can contest the overall.
Maybe too early to conclude, considering his age, but possibly a single-peak material.
Agreed.I think it's just that the Tour-Vuelta GC combo with the Olympics road race on another continent in between would be just too much for a 22 years old who has been in form all year since February. You don't want to overrace a rider who still has 6 years of a multimillion contract left!
